Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5472
Next month in: 01:32:08
Server time: 18:27:51, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): Autokrator30 | itsjustgav | Neo_kami | SocDemDundorfian | starfruit | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: People's Defence Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Anarchist-Communist League

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2121

Description[?]:

In order the the people of Quanzar be better defended from potential foreign aggression, and in order to discourage invasion by threatening resistance by our people in the event of occupation, it is hereby resolved:

That soviets may be established to independently produce armaments
That adults may privately own arms, under a licensing regime to ensure that they will only be used for sport, professional uses, or the defence of Quanzar
That local Worker's Defence Militias shall be established across Quanzar

The licensing regime shall require that owners of guns have undergone psychological checks and military training, and be a member of their locality's Worker's Defence Militia, unless the weapon is required for professional use (ie gamekeepers)

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:09:27, October 04, 2005 CET
FromNeoSocialist Party
ToDebating the People's Defence Act
MessagePeople need security not weapons. If we cannot protect our own citizens let's reform our society, but I will not allow people to get weapons freely.

Date15:37:47, October 04, 2005 CET
FromTudeh Party of Quanzar
ToDebating the People's Defence Act
MessageI'm not entirely opposed to this. Whilst, like the Neos, I would hate to see mass popular armament for the sake of it, I think that if we specify what the license is I'd like this bill. I think that licenses should only be given to those who have completed military training and only used to defend the Union. Sort of like a creation of a people's militia.

Date16:02:12, October 04, 2005 CET
FromAnti-Party Political Party
ToDebating the People's Defence Act
MessageI suggest that arms should only be owned by Soviets rather than individuals, but that they may be issued to any individual who has undergone basic military training and perhaps psychological/background checks for the purposes of defence of the Union and further weaponry and/or combat training.

This ought to make decisions over licensing and choices of which types of weapons are appropriate more simple and facilitate democratic control.

Date16:41:21, October 04, 2005 CET
FromAnarchist-Communist League
ToDebating the People's Defence Act
MessageA worker's militia type idea was what I was hoping for with this- the Deltarians, or other reactionaries, may dcide to move against us one day.

(OOC: I wonder if we'll be able to get this simulated when war is introduced)

Date03:02:23, October 05, 2005 CET
FromNeoSocialist Party
ToDebating the People's Defence Act
MessageIf weapons are given to Soviets themselves then I accept

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 401

no
 

Total Seats: 0

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Discuss flag designs at the Flag Designs thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=37

Random quote: "We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children." - Native American proverb

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66