We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Pet ownership of 2120
Details
Submitted by[?]: Malivia Democratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2122
Description[?]:
| Reverts the regulation of ownership of wild animals to localities |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of wild animals as pets.
Old value:: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Current: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Proposed: This matter is left up to the local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:09:34, October 04, 2005 CET | From | Malivia Democratic Party | To | Debating the Pet ownership of 2120 |
| Message | The MDP does not believe the federal government should involve itself with something trivial as who may own a wild pet. |
| Date | 18:08:42, October 04, 2005 CET | From |  Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Pet ownership of 2120 |
| Message | we are fine with local governments handling this issue. |
| Date | 02:12:26, October 05, 2005 CET | From | LibCom Party | To | Debating the Pet ownership of 2120 |
| Message | We support. |
| Date | 02:20:25, October 05, 2005 CET | From | Social Republican Party | To | Debating the Pet ownership of 2120 |
| Message | support. |
| Date | 14:06:36, October 05, 2005 CET | From | Malivia Democratic Party | To | Debating the Pet ownership of 2120 |
| Message | Well, this was stupid of me. I started a vote on this and the other bill, and forget entirely that it will be reset in 3 months after the elections. Just ignore the votes for now. |
| Date | 15:50:34, October 05, 2005 CET | From | United Labour Party | To | Debating the Pet ownership of 2120 |
| Message | Taking wild animals from their natural habitat and making them puts not only violates animal welfare but is also an ecological nightmare. |
| Date | 00:14:06, October 06, 2005 CET | From | Malivia Democratic Party | To | Debating the Pet ownership of 2120 |
| Message | Does this mean the ULP opposes farms? As farms include many animals that would otherwise be considered wild. This is why it should be a local issue. |
| Date | 20:28:43, October 06, 2005 CET | From | United Labour Party | To | Debating the Pet ownership of 2120 |
| Message | Farms have domesticated animals specially bred for agriculture, not wild animals. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 64 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 22 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 14 |
| Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed). |
| Random quote: "Sometimes it is said that man cannot be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others?" - Thomas Jefferson |