Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5474
Next month in: 02:01:45
Server time: 09:58:14, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): TH081 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of June 2656

Details

Submitted by[?]: Normand Pluralist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2657

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet, according to election laws:
http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=183773
http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=198268 (expires 2694)

Here\\\'s the math (rounding in representation, but not in calculation):
DSP: 143/600=.24>*13=3.10 > 3
AUP: 120/600=.2>*13=2.6 > 2
NPP: 85/600=.14>*13=1.84 > 2
CP: 80/600=.13>*13=1.73 > 2
LSDR: 55/600=.09>*13=1.19 > 1
MSMP: 41/600=.07>*13=0.89 > 1
SD: 41/600=.07>*13=0.89 > 1
SGP: 35/600=.06>*13=.76 > 1

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:00:04, October 27, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2656
MessageProposing a Cabinet, according to election laws:
http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=183773
http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=198268 (expires 2694)

Here\'s the math (rounding in representation, but not in calculation):
DSP: 143/600=.24>*13=3.10 > 3
AUP: 120/600=.2>*13=2.6 > 2
NPP: 85/600=.14>*13=1.84 > 2
CP: 80/600=.13>*13=1.73 > 2
LSDR: 55/600=.09>*13=1.19 > 1
MSMP: 41/600=.07>*13=0.89 > 1
SD: 41/600=.07>*13=0.89 > 1
SGP: 35/600=.06>*13=.76 > 1

Date07:02:19, October 27, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2656
MessageWe have tried our best to keep everyone happy with this one, which is particularly generous, given the fact that half of the parties in Sekowo currently lack representation and would almost certainly have voted for the cabinet, anyway.

Date07:04:21, October 27, 2008 CET
From Imperial Pluralism Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2656
MessageWe support

Date07:32:05, October 27, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2656
MessageAs the NPP broke cabinet law previously we are voting no, as the law requires us to.

Date17:50:38, October 27, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2656
MessageAs was proved in earlier bills, the law was followed. As stated previously, that law (written by DSP) was poorly written and needs to be re-written. As it hasn\'t yet done so, the old text still holds.

Date18:21:50, October 27, 2008 CET
FromLiberal Social Democratic Republicans
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2656
MessageWe want one more position in the cabinet; hence, we oppose this act.

Date18:49:18, October 27, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2656
MessageLSDR, we use proportional representation in Sekowo. It\'s part of our law.

Date21:29:30, October 27, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2656
MessageThe only way we\'ll vote for or (in the case we have Tenno) give NPP a seat/forgive their actions is if the draconian measures against our party that forbids us certain seats is nullified.

Date22:16:25, October 27, 2008 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2656
MessageOOC: Silly new parties never reading our history. SGP and SD were good about it, but I hope we don\'t go back to that string of new parties that don\'t know anything about us.

Date00:54:50, October 28, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2656
MessageOOC:
I\'m voting yes since I just noticed the article that fixes the name of the Folkstamma.

Date09:22:36, October 28, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 2656
Message[[Aren\'t you easy to please?]]

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
       

Total Seats: 545

no
 

Total Seats: 55

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Characters are considered to be "owned" by the player who first mentioned or created them. In practice, players may share responsibility for role-playing a character, but ultimate authority rests with the owner.

    Random quote: "The government was set to protect man from criminals, and the Constitution was written to protect man from the government." - Ayn Rand

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 84