We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Defense Industry Privitization Act (2657)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Social Democratic Republicans
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2658
Description[?]:
| To privatize but properly regulate the defense sector, but to provide subsidies for research and development of certain defense-related projects. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Current: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Proposed: Defence industries are privately owned but subsidised by the state.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:41:54, October 29, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Defense Industry Privitization Act (2657) |
| Message | We are against handing over key areas of our defence to the immoral system of capitalism. |
| Date | 05:40:51, October 29, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Defense Industry Privitization Act (2657) |
| Message | We actually prefer the current option, which would involve a maximum of competition. Subsidizing private defense industries may lead to greater amounts of waste. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 255 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 345 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections. |
| Random quote: "The main problem of the left is that it has been traditionally divided and unable to reach agreements between different leftist views, whilst the right has almost always moved in the same direction by giving concessions to different rightist points of view." - Aelius Celer, former Selucian politician |