Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 03:27:08
Server time: 20:32:51, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): Archangel_1 | FireboyUK | friedrich3 | Liu Che | reformist2024 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Moral Hazard in Health Care Elimination Act (2657)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Social Democratic Republicans

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2658

Description[?]:

To reduce public health care subsidies for upper-income individuals to prevent excessive consumption of unecessary health care.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:41:01, October 30, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Moral Hazard in Health Care Elimination Act (2657)
MessageRidiculous, this would only lead to private medical facilities skimping and not giving their best.

Date00:49:18, October 30, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Moral Hazard in Health Care Elimination Act (2657)
MessageThat\'s entirely untrue; they still have to compete with the public system.

Date02:01:20, October 30, 2008 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Moral Hazard in Health Care Elimination Act (2657)
MessageWe are abstaining on the grounds that we do not like the description/title connection.

OOC: See what I did there. Though I honestly don\'t see how the two are linked.

Date03:02:16, October 30, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Moral Hazard in Health Care Elimination Act (2657)
MessageCompetition does not equal the best, it equals what they can get away with while still turning a profit.

Date08:36:09, October 30, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Moral Hazard in Health Care Elimination Act (2657)
MessageThey can get away with more if they\'re subsidized.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 340

no
   

Total Seats: 219

abstain
 

Total Seats: 41


Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker).

Random quote: "How many legs does a dog have if you call its tail a leg? Four. Calling a dog's tail a leg does not make it a leg." - Abraham Lincoln

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56