We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Moral Hazard in Health Care Elimination Act (2657)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Social Democratic Republicans
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2658
Description[?]:
To reduce public health care subsidies for upper-income individuals to prevent excessive consumption of unecessary health care. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Health care policy.
Old value:: There is a free public health care system and a small number of private clinics, which are heavily regulated to ensure they treat their patients well and provide good care.
Current: There is a public health care system, but private clinics are allowed.
Proposed: There is a public health care system, but private clinics are allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:41:01, October 30, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Moral Hazard in Health Care Elimination Act (2657) |
Message | Ridiculous, this would only lead to private medical facilities skimping and not giving their best. |
Date | 00:49:18, October 30, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Moral Hazard in Health Care Elimination Act (2657) |
Message | That\'s entirely untrue; they still have to compete with the public system. |
Date | 02:01:20, October 30, 2008 CET | From | Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the Moral Hazard in Health Care Elimination Act (2657) |
Message | We are abstaining on the grounds that we do not like the description/title connection. OOC: See what I did there. Though I honestly don\'t see how the two are linked. |
Date | 03:02:16, October 30, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Moral Hazard in Health Care Elimination Act (2657) |
Message | Competition does not equal the best, it equals what they can get away with while still turning a profit. |
Date | 08:36:09, October 30, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Moral Hazard in Health Care Elimination Act (2657) |
Message | They can get away with more if they\'re subsidized. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 340 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 219 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 41 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker). |
Random quote: "How many legs does a dog have if you call its tail a leg? Four. Calling a dog's tail a leg does not make it a leg." - Abraham Lincoln |