We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: CP.0171.2660 Military Strength Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2661
Description[?]:
| A stronger military during difficult times. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning biological and chemical weaponry.
Old value:: The nation shall never purchase, produce, or store biological or chemical weaponry, for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Current: The nation shall never purchase, produce, or store biological or chemical weaponry, for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Current: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Proposed: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the use of land mines by the army.
Old value:: The use of land mines is prohibited.
Current: The use of land mines is prohibited.
Proposed: The Government leaves this to the army to decide upon.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Current: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve a term in the military.
Proposed: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve a term of civilian national service.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 07:49:44, November 04, 2008 CET | From |  Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the CP.0171.2660 Military Strength Bill |
| Message | Weak oppose as drafted. |
| Date | 18:24:37, November 04, 2008 CET | From | Liberal Social Democratic Republicans | To | Debating the CP.0171.2660 Military Strength Bill |
| Message | We only support Article Four. |
| Date | 23:46:34, November 04, 2008 CET | From | Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the CP.0171.2660 Military Strength Bill |
| Message | We arn\'t quite sure about where the draftees go, as in war, military is preferable. LSDR the article numbers are different for everyone. |
| Date | 00:55:25, November 05, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the CP.0171.2660 Military Strength Bill |
| Message | We only support the national service article so we are voting against. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 276 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 231 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Selucia is Particracy's modern take on Ancient Rome, located on the continent of Majatra. |
| Random quote: "It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." - Thomas Jefferson |