Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 02:15:34
Server time: 17:44:25, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): hyraemous | lulus | Moderation | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the New World Order

Details

Submitted by[?]: Guds og Konges Kjemprene

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2662

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the <a href=\"viewtreaty.php?treatyid=1076\">New World Order</a>. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Here is our explanation why:

- As said in an other bill: We have to create a diplomatic network to ensure Kazulia has friends.
- Although the treaty sounds as if the NWO was merely an organisation or fascist or at least fascist-friendly parties and nations, this is not the case. As members of the NWO we can conclusively say, that it serves only as a network of states, and that the only common thing these states have is their allegiance to the NWO when another state is attacked.
- All participating states remain existing in full autonomy, something that almost every other international organisation cannot guarantee.
- The countries having ratified this treaty are only a few, but the parties that are members of the organisation are many - and at this time there are more than the nations in the treaty who are actively promoting the NWO.
- This is one of the few organisation that really works, most organisations only exist somewhere in the background, and it often happens that if one nations actually needs the help of such an organisation, the other nations are quite quick to find an excuse why they should not help - a situation we have actually seen before, and more than once.


Conclusively it has to be said, that while the description of the treaty tends to sound extreme, it was written by a more \"extremist\" member - most parties aren\'t like that, they are mostly peaceful, and you can find parties of every political ideology in the organisation - socialists, communists, liberals, libertarians, monarchists, democrats, just to name a few.

We sincerely hope that this proposal will be supported by all our parties, as it would clearly show that we all are united in the wish to make Kazulia an even better place.
If you really find yourselves unable to vote for this, please give your reasons, maybe there are still misunderstandings left.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:51:04, November 07, 2008 CET
FromKristen Socialdemokratisk Partiet
ToDebating the Ratification of the New World Order
MessageThe N.W.O. has cruely attacked Alduria and they state that they will \"conquest lesser Terra.\" what is lesser Terra? There is no \"Lesser Terra,\" in our minds. the people of the world should be equal, and this militarist, cruel, organization is not helping that cause.

Date16:10:23, November 07, 2008 CET
FromGuds og Konges Kjemprene
ToDebating the Ratification of the New World Order
MessageAlduria? We think you mean Aloria, and Aloria has been the aggressor in this case, founding organisations against the NWO and supporting their enemies.

And about the \"lesser Terra\" bit - as we explained, this is one of the more \"extreme\" parts. In fact, \"lesser Terra\" is a term normally used for those who stand against equality of the people. The NWO is helping the cause of \"equality\" more than any other organisation - as they try to bring this equality to every nation in Terra. The concept of greater and lesser Terra is not the setting of a goal to achieve, it is a description of the current status - a world divided into the just and the injust - and therefore the goal is to end this situation. It really is more of a philosophical concept than a real practice, it could have maybe chosen to be described with better terms, but as we said, the guy who wrote them had a style by far more \"extreme\" than the organisation is. We sincerely hope that you will alter your decision.

Date03:52:59, November 08, 2008 CET
FromGuds og Konges Kjemprene
ToDebating the Ratification of the New World Order
MessagePlease consider also the message of the Alorian party in the nation\'s board.

Date16:30:41, November 09, 2008 CET
FromKristen Socialdemokratisk Partiet
ToDebating the Ratification of the New World Order
MessageI am sorry. I meant Aloria. (I get the two names mixed up some of the time.)

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 209

no
  

Total Seats: 291

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated.

    Random quote: "Usually the nonsense liberals spout is kind of cute, but in wartime their instinctive idiocy is life-threatening." - Ann Coulter

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 45