We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Environmental Protection Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Darnussian Justice Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2666
Description[?]:
This helps protect the environment. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards hunting endangered animals.
Old value:: The government enforces no regulations.
Current: The government enforces no regulations.
Proposed: Hunting endangered animals is illegal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: The government promotes forest clearance.
Current: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Proposed: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy regarding a national park system.
Old value:: The government outlaws designation of property for public parks.
Current: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Proposed: The government designates ecological preservation zones but does not fund their oversight.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:45:35, November 14, 2008 CET | From | Darnussian Justice Party | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act |
Message | These are some pretty simple requests... |
Date | 10:23:15, November 15, 2008 CET | From | Peoples Choise Union | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act |
Message | PCU can agree on them. |
Date | 13:09:25, November 15, 2008 CET | From | Loyalistische Partei | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act |
Message | We can\'t agree with Article 2. Forrestry has been one of our great industries for decades. Of course promoting forrest clearance might be too much these days, so how about something from the middle? |
Date | 13:10:57, November 15, 2008 CET | From | Loyalistische Partei | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act |
Message | Also, does this proposal mean you are not allowed to log your own woods from land that YOU, as a person, own? That is just not right. It belongs to the landowner. |
Date | 14:36:03, November 15, 2008 CET | From | Darnussian Justice Party | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act |
Message | All you need to do is get a license to forest! |
Date | 14:37:33, November 15, 2008 CET | From | Darnussian Justice Party | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act |
Message | Hey what happened!!??? OPP is gone!!! i mean, they were an opposition party but now there are only parties in Darnussia |
Date | 19:05:56, November 15, 2008 CET | From | Surprise Party | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act |
Message | I dunno what happened to them. |
Date | 23:10:31, November 16, 2008 CET | From | Peoples Choise Union | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act |
Message | this bill passed quite quickly. It has already been approved before i voted on it. Should check this page more often. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |
yes |
Total Seats: 156 | |
no |
Total Seats: 115 | |
abstain |
Total Seats: 162 |
Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
Random quote: "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be." - Thomas Jefferson |