Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5461
Next month in: 02:02:39
Server time: 05:57:20, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Ahmad | Aur3ale | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Gov.0038.2668

Details

Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2670

Description[?]:

Discussions on Mutual Recognition Between Sekowo and Beiteynu


For a great deal of time Sekowo has refused to recognize Beiyteynu's claims on Squibble and
likewise Beiteynu has refused to recognize Sekowo's claims on Tropica.
We feel that it is now the time to resolve this.

Upon the passing of this bill Sekowo shall start the process of creating and ratifying a treaty
with the following provisions;
A. Sekowo shall recognize Beiteynu's claims over the parts of Squibble it still controls.
B. Beiytenu shall recognize all of Sekowo's claims and that only Dovanian nations have a right to Dovanian territory.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date08:04:28, November 20, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Gov.0038.2668
MessageI agree in principle. Would this be a treaty?

Date08:08:24, November 20, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Gov.0038.2668
MessageIndeed it would.

Date08:24:49, November 20, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Gov.0038.2668
MessageDoes this have the popular support in Beiytenu or just the ringmaster?

Date08:33:47, November 20, 2008 CET
FromUnited Land Movement
ToDebating the Gov.0038.2668
MessageIt sets a bad precedent.

Date08:59:31, November 20, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Gov.0038.2668
MessageIt has support there.
Beiteynu only has two parties, and they're pretty much the same on everything, this included.

TGP, how does it set a bad precedent?
We're talking about finally bringing an end to a situation over a century old in a way that is beneficial to us.

Date15:40:13, November 20, 2008 CET
FromCentral Union of Trade and Economy
ToDebating the Gov.0038.2668
MessageWe will support this, so our vote would count after the next elections.

Date19:35:49, November 20, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Gov.0038.2668
MessageWe will wait before making a decision. I am curious what TGP has to say.

Date04:33:49, November 21, 2008 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Gov.0038.2668
MessageWe would support this, despite our general like of tension to keep a nation on its toes.

OOC: Mainly because they are a rather annoying nation.

Date20:12:34, November 21, 2008 CET
FromUnited Land Movement
ToDebating the Gov.0038.2668
MessageOOC: ignore my previous comment, I was having a brain fart on the geography.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 369

no
 

Total Seats: 0

abstain
  

Total Seats: 160


Random fact: Submitting a bill without any proposals in it will not attract or detract voters. It will not raise your visibility or change your political position.

Random quote: "He comes out of hibernation once every three years and says something stupid. No wonder the UR fell apart." - Tirza Sommer, Pragmatic Party Leader, on the Dorvish President, Leonhard Khan.

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 65