We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Withdrawl From The New World Order
Details
Submitted by[?]: Zardugali Monarchist Consortium
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2673
Description[?]:
| It is simple. |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the New World Order.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:28:25, November 26, 2008 CET | From | Ancient and Noble Order of the Cavaliers | To | Debating the Withdrawl From The New World Order |
| Message | Can I get a link? Are we at war because Jeltania wants our oil or because of our association with the NWO? I'm confused. |
| Date | 01:38:45, November 26, 2008 CET | From | League of Christian Socialists | To | Debating the Withdrawl From The New World Order |
| Message | We strongly support Zardugal's withdrawal from this organisation. |
| Date | 01:56:33, November 26, 2008 CET | From | Confederacy of Social Darwinists | To | Debating the Withdrawl From The New World Order |
| Message | What right does a nation have to tell us who we associate with? Further, why should we change our policies due to the urging of foreigners who seek to undermine the sovereignty of Zardugal? |
| Date | 02:04:42, November 26, 2008 CET | From | Zardugali Monarchist Consortium | To | Debating the Withdrawl From The New World Order |
| Message | But the NWO seeks to undermine the sovereignty of Zardugal. We are not proposing to withdraw because of the threats by the pathetic Jeltania; we are proposing this because it is the right thing to do. We believe what Ambs. William Haltanius talked on this evening was quite right, for our nation to take a leaf out of Keymon's book and not get involved in the New World Order or do not get involved with Jeltania's wars. |
| Date | 02:12:07, November 26, 2008 CET | From | Confederacy of Social Darwinists | To | Debating the Withdrawl From The New World Order |
| Message | Jelbania is seeking to actively undermine the territorial integrity of Zardugal itself, the New World Order has never disenfranchised a single member of it. Added to this how can we simply expect the treacherous, greedy, lying Jeltarians? |
| Date | 02:45:41, November 26, 2008 CET | From | Zardugali Monarchist Consortium | To | Debating the Withdrawl From The New World Order |
| Message | Our Consortium is not expecting the Jeltarians, but we are putting our trust in the words of Ambassador Haltius. The NWO will inevitably mean the end of national sovereignty. |
| Date | 04:25:39, November 26, 2008 CET | From | Confederacy of Social Darwinists | To | Debating the Withdrawl From The New World Order |
| Message | As long as we are loyal, we have nothing to fear. |
| Date | 14:01:52, November 26, 2008 CET | From | Capitalist Party of Zardugal | To | Debating the Withdrawl From The New World Order |
| Message | Who was the first to support us? The NWO. They attempted to build a wall on the Zardugal border to protect us. Zardugal's safety is important to the NWO. |
| Date | 09:18:00, November 27, 2008 CET | From | Pro People Party | To | Debating the Withdrawl From The New World Order |
| Message | The NWO is a great ally to have in treacherous times like this. The jelbanians have free roam to do as they please, but the NWO keep them on hold. the NWO is one of the most powerful organizations in the world, and i for one am glad to be ont heir side. |
| Date | 02:11:11, November 28, 2008 CET | From |  Saiserist League | To | Debating the Withdrawl From The New World Order |
| Message | We are very much impressed and enheartened by this Zardugali show of support. We are glad they have seen the truth of the New World Order. The NWO, far more than any other organization, shortsighted alliance, petty mutual-defense pact or pathetic collective-security accord, looks out for the interests and security of its members. No loyal nation or party of the New World Order will ever be allowed to be crushed under Lesser Terran influence. In like kind, all members earn the constant fruits from our endless conquests, in money, loot, slaves, priceless artifacts, whatever is desired. Everybody within the New World Order benefits, at the expense of those who would seek to harm the nations and parties of the New World Order. And all we ask in return is your loyalty. |
| Date | 00:00:19, November 29, 2008 CET | From | Zardugali Monarchist Consortium | To | Debating the Withdrawl From The New World Order |
| Message | And you do not have it. Our loyalty is to our Sovereignty and the supremacy of the National Directory and His Enlightened Majesty the King. To the people of our United Realms and to our fellow human brothers, be they of working class or the aristocracy. Our loyalty is to justice. |
| Date | 00:49:26, November 29, 2008 CET | From | Saiserist League | To | Debating the Withdrawl From The New World Order |
| Message | So this is our repayment for being the only organization that came to your aid when Jelbania invaded and killed innocent civilians? For being the one organization that preserved your nation's independence from Jelbanian domination? We have always sought only the safety and betterment of Zardugal. We protected you from Jelbania, even now our blood and might has wrought a Zardugali Dominion of Cobura, our gift to you. Is this how you repay an organization that has done more than could ever be expected to enrich and benefit Zardugal? |
| Date | 01:18:42, November 29, 2008 CET | From | Zardugali Monarchist Consortium | To | Debating the Withdrawl From The New World Order |
| Message | This is how we repay an organisation that seeks to take over the free-nations of Terra, and whose war with the 'Lesser Terra' has caused the very conflict which you claim to have protected us from. A cliché charade. |
| Date | 04:58:54, November 29, 2008 CET | From | Confederacy of Social Darwinists | To | Debating the Withdrawl From The New World Order |
| Message | I, as acting head of the NWO faction within Zardugal, do demand a recall election before such a vote takes place. |
| Date | 05:56:55, November 29, 2008 CET | From | Confederacy of Social Darwinists | To | Debating the Withdrawl From The New World Order |
| Message | Why do you continue to defend the invansion of Zardugal? |
| Date | 15:52:13, November 29, 2008 CET | From | Zardugali Monarchist Consortium | To | Debating the Withdrawl From The New World Order |
| Message | "We are not defending the invasion. The invasion was caused by the war between the New World Order and its so called 'Lesser Terra'. Your party believes in social Darwinism and our Consortium are not surprised at your defence of the New World Order and its unjust social categorisation. The NWO may support us militarily, but we will not sacrifice our freedom for our security! Give me freedom or give me death!" - Eleanor Aurelien, Secretary for Foreign Affairs. |
| Date | 19:28:55, November 29, 2008 CET | From | Confederacy of Social Darwinists | To | Debating the Withdrawl From The New World Order |
| Message | My party believes in Social Darwinism solely because we believe it the best method to encourage a society based on merit, so before you so foolishly claim, as the youngest party in Zardugal, that you can understand my party's objectives it might be advised to learn of my party's defense of such things, and it was my party that played a key role in the reestablishment of the crown in Zardugal. Also, the invasion had nothing to do with such things. The comments made by Jelbania clearly indicate that they sought control over our land and our natural resources above all else, fool. As for the NWO they allow us total independence in setting our policies, they give us the freedom, by protecting our beloved nation, that we need to build a future for ourselves. Your current freedoms, that you take for granted, are due to the actions of that parties that came before. -Earl Stronky |
| Date | 01:07:07, November 30, 2008 CET | From | League of Christian Socialists | To | Debating the Withdrawl From The New World Order |
| Message | Before dismissing the Consortium so casually as "the youngest party in Zardugal" Earl Stronky would do well to remember that they polled over 65 million votes at the last election, and all those people don't deserve to have their elected representatives talked down to. The New World Order is precisely the sort of ruthless, immoral, tyrannical coalition of governments that Zardugal should have nothing to do with. They are bent on war, oppression and domination. Zardugal is well rid of such allies. Leonard Brownlow (Minister of Education & Culture and Secretary of the League of Christian Socialists) |
| Date | 01:42:00, November 30, 2008 CET | From | Zardugali Monarchist Consortium | To | Debating the Withdrawl From The New World Order |
| Message | As representing our Consortium, I would like to take this opportunity to appreciate any beneficial changes that your Confederacy has made before our Consortium's official formation as a party. However, the invasion was based on pursuit of Zardugal's natural resources, but only in retaliation to the New World Order. We in no way defend the hostile actions taken against the United Realms of Zardugal, but the pathetic wars between the NWO and the 'Free Federation' are not for Zardugal to concern itself with. We are a peaceful nation, of good just causes. And we fully endorse the Minister of Education and Culture's claim about the NWO, they are a corrupt organisation. One of the recent bills passed in the Central Greater Terran Region One, known previously as Hutori if I remember, was titled 'Democracy Will Never Emerge Again' and another 'Stamping Out Any More Democracy'. Well Zardugal is a nation of strong democratic tradition, and most of all, of moral tradition; we renounce such organisations as the NWO. -Chancellor Prof. Aurelien. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 321 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 239 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 40 |
| Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law. |
| Random quote: "The only way I can lose this election is if I'm caught in bed with either a dead girl or a live boy." - Edwin W. Edwards |