We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Foreign Policy Reform 2121
Details
Submitted by[?]: Anti-Particracy and Unionist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2123
Description[?]:
| A general reform, part 1. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Nation's policy with regards to an intelligence agency.
Old value:: The nation has an intelligence agency that is permitted by law to undertake all types of covert operations in other countries.
Current: The nation has an intelligence agency that is permitted by law to undertake all types of covert operations in other countries.
Proposed: The nation has an intelligence agency, but it is limited to counter-intelligence and surveillance of other countries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:09:48, October 07, 2005 CET | From |  Anti-Particracy and Unionist Party | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Reform 2121 |
| Message | We risk angering other nations if we persist with our current policy. If Zardugal legalises the APUP's proposal, we will maintain a defence against people who might wish to make war with this country, but do not play an active part in their politics. If this is to be a free and democratic country, we must extend that democracy right to our borders and not beyond, because that goes against democracy itself. |
| Date | 03:25:19, October 07, 2005 CET | From | Labor Party | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Reform 2121 |
| Message | I agree. |
| Date | 05:09:20, October 07, 2005 CET | From | People's Democratic Party | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Reform 2121 |
| Message | We oppose. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 401 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Real-life quotations may be used in Particracy, but the real-life speaker or author should always be referenced in an OOC (out-of-character) note alongside the quotation. |
| Random quote: "It makes no difference, in principle, if this 'collective will' is divined by the edicts of a dictator or by majority vote, so long as the rights of the individual may still be sacrificed." - Robert Garmong |