Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 02:29:29
Server time: 13:30:30, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Tayes3 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Power Regulation and Provision 2121

Details

Submitted by[?]: Anti-Particracy and Unionist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2122

Description[?]:

Bring regulation to the energy industry by nationalisation of a common community resource.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:37:51, October 07, 2005 CET
FromLabor Party
ToDebating the Power Regulation and Provision 2121
MessageI would prefer : Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated. Energy is a needed by all homes and those private companies could inflate prices that make it unattainable for those on lower incomes. Hence we would have people living in 3rd World standards in time, where the rich could afford power.

Date03:39:21, October 07, 2005 CET
FromLabor Party
ToDebating the Power Regulation and Provision 2121
MessageI meant to say ' where only the rich could afford power'

Date03:40:37, October 07, 2005 CET
FromLabor Party
ToDebating the Power Regulation and Provision 2121
MessageSorry misread bill, was looking at current proposal rather than proposed. So i agree with the proposal.

Date05:04:46, October 07, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Democratic Party
ToDebating the Power Regulation and Provision 2121
MessageWe would have supported subsidies to low income families, but not full nationalisation.

Date17:26:01, October 07, 2005 CET
FromAnti-Particracy and Unionist Party
ToDebating the Power Regulation and Provision 2121
MessageNationalisation of such a key industry can only benefit everyone. Can you not be persuaded to reconsider, Napoleon?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 0

no
 

Total Seats: 401

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map.

Random quote: "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius, and a lot of courage, to move in the opposite direction." - Albert Einstein

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56