Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5471
Next month in: 03:50:14
Server time: 12:09:45, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: We looked away for a moment.

Details

Submitted by[?]: Likaton Coalition of the Willing

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2678

Description[?]:

And you proved you couldn't be trusted.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:24:29, December 08, 2008 CET
FromNeo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika
ToDebating the We looked away for a moment.
MessageThe Neo Kanist Rite Party find it quite hard to trust the majority party who think it is ok to have sexual intercourse in public.

Date13:50:11, December 08, 2008 CET
FromLiberal Conservatists
ToDebating the We looked away for a moment.
MessageSeemingly, if most of the parties involved in the voting of the same bill voted for yes, than what does it show about Willing, if he changes it? This act of selfishness shows no more than a dictator abusing his power in order to control the Country in his own means! THIS has showed us that Willing cannot be trusted at all!

Date17:25:13, December 08, 2008 CET
FromFree thinking Party
ToDebating the We looked away for a moment.
Messageamen to that

Date20:06:40, December 08, 2008 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the We looked away for a moment.
MessageNeoKanists, where exactly do you get your strange ideas regarding public sex? Are you fantasising on Convocation time?

Date20:19:51, December 08, 2008 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the We looked away for a moment.
MessageNeo Kanists, we have to call you out on this.

In December 2676, we passed this act http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=230357. If you read carefully article 14...

Old value:: There are no laws regarding obscene public acts.
Proposed: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.

Over 6 months later, the NeoKanist act to make passionate kissing, and possibly the eating of bananas http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=230502 (June 2677) we voted down, as we felt that :

Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Proposed: All sexually implicit actions are illegal in public.

...went too far.

In what way are we condoning sex in public? By banning it? That's a weird way of supporting it in our book.

We would draw your attention to laws regarding slander and libel.


Date21:43:47, December 08, 2008 CET
FromNeo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika
ToDebating the We looked away for a moment.
MessagePerhaps we were a little hasty with our earlier remarks regarding the Likatonian Coalition of the Willing's view on sexual actions in public, and we apolgise for these however we cannot hide the fact that we disagree with nearly everything the party says especially this bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 515

no
    

Total Seats: 151

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Real life-life nationalities, cultures or ethnicities should not be referenced in Particracy (eg. "German").

    Random quote: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." - Bill Clinton

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 72