We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: HEGC's security bill of November 2677
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hobrazian Extraordinary Gentlemen's Club
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2678
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Ownership of guns by private individuals.
Old value:: Adult individuals may not own firearms unless professionally required.
Current: Individuals are allowed to own firearms as long as they do not have a history of dangerous mental illness or a violent criminality.
Proposed: Individuals are not permitted to own firearms under any circumstances.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Current: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Proposed: The government has the right to monitor information of individuals without letting them know.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:37:24, December 09, 2008 CET | From | Classical Liberal Party | To | Debating the HEGC's security bill of November 2677 |
Message | Stop mixing totally unrelated proposals!!!! |
Date | 10:43:19, December 09, 2008 CET | From | Hobrazian Extraordinary Gentlemen's Club | To | Debating the HEGC's security bill of November 2677 |
Message | That coming from a party which liked doing that very often until know? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 151 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 249 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "The Lord is a man of war" - Exodus 15:3 |