Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5471
Next month in: 00:44:33
Server time: 07:15:26, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: NFP Bill2

Details

Submitted by[?]: Nationalist Freedom Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2123

Description[?]:

A bill to seperate state and church

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:53:15, October 08, 2005 CET
From Kanjoran People's Party
ToDebating the NFP Bill2
MessageI agree with Article 2, but am undecided on Article 1 and leaning toward no.

Date11:43:03, October 08, 2005 CET
From Nationalist Freedom Party
ToDebating the NFP Bill2
Message"I agree with Article 2, but am undecided on Article 1 and leaning toward no."

I informed the World Jewish Society about your previous part in the banning of jewish schools. - did they get in contact with you?

I must inform them about the latest!

Date14:49:11, October 08, 2005 CET
From Kanjoran People's Party
ToDebating the NFP Bill2
MessageYes, they did contact me and I laid out my argument nicely. The leader accepted my good intentions although urged me to accept strictly regulated public schools. I told him that due to my strong feelings in both directions, I will never be comfortable with either decision, and I would always use my best judgement in deciding these.

I remain a member.

Date14:52:28, October 08, 2005 CET
From Kanjoran People's Party
ToDebating the NFP Bill2
MessageAlso, half the leadership seems to agree whole-heartedly with my decision, while half are against. Your contact will not be highly damaging in the least.

Date16:25:29, October 08, 2005 CET
From Nationalist Freedom Party
ToDebating the NFP Bill2
Message"Also, half the leadership seems to agree whole-heartedly with my decision, while half are against. Your contact will not be highly damaging in the least."

The reason I contacted the WJC is because you are a member of the WJC and you are baning Jewish schools. I thought that they had a right to know. I'm a member of two Christian organisations, if I voted no to this bill, I wouldn't be worth my salt.

I was simply informing them about this, thats all. If the WJC like to ban Jewish schools, thats fine, I didn't think they agreed with that, but we live and learn.

Date19:47:20, October 08, 2005 CET
From Populist Liberal Party
ToDebating the NFP Bill2
MessageThe PLP is against private schools of any sort, but especially religious schools.

We oppose private schools because all parents should have the same educational options, so that educational inequity does not preserve families' economic inequity.

We oppose religious schools in particular because some-- maybe not even more, but some-- will teach creationism and many would have absintence-only sex education, and to teach a child that sort of thing is child abuse.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 144

no
   

Total Seats: 161

abstain
   

Total Seats: 294


Random fact: In your Message Centre there is a really useful feature which allows you to subscribe to all of the bill debates in your nation. If you use that, then the "Watched Discussions" section will show you every time a new message has been posted on a bill. You can also subscribe to other pages you want to follow, such as your nation message-board, party organisations or bills outside your nation which you are interested in.

Random quote: "This administration is not sympathetic to corporations; it is indentured to corporations." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62