We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Family Protection Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Revival Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2123
Description[?]:
| The purpose of this Act is to combine measures that protect the family and enhance it's standing withing society. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning who can proceed with adoption; in case adoption is legal.
Old value:: Everyone may adopt children.
Current: Only couples may adopt children.
Proposed: Only heterosexual couples may adopt children.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Military stance on homosexuality.
Old value:: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Current: Homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military actively seeks to remove homosexuals from it.
Proposed: Homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military actively seeks to remove homosexuals from it.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy toward marriage.
Old value:: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Current: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Proposed: Civil marriages are defined by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 07:56:23, October 08, 2005 CET | From | Anarchist-Communist League | To | Debating the Family Protection Act |
| Message | A disgusting bill designed to disenfranchise a perfectly valid section of our population, and prevent, by article 1, and potentially 3, the formation of many families that are just as valid as any other type. |
| Date | 09:21:43, October 08, 2005 CET | From | NeoSocialist Party | To | Debating the Family Protection Act |
| Message | We shall not stay passive when this government wants to take away the rights of somebody only for their sexual preference! Nay we Say! |
| Date | 14:04:26, October 08, 2005 CET | From | Tudeh Party of Quanzar | To | Debating the Family Protection Act |
| Message | Homosexuality is entirely as valid as heterosexuality, I agree. Therefore, I disagree with these proposals. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 219 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 130 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 52 |
| Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility. |
| Random quote: "The decadent international but individualistic capitalism in the hands of which we found ourselves after the war is not a success. It is not intelligent. It is not beautiful. It is not just. It is not virtuous. And it doesn't deliver the goods." - John Maynard Keynes |