We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: H+ Economics 1
Details
Submitted by[?]: H+ Paradigm
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2686
Description[?]:
| ... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on advertising
Old value:: Only advertising that meets certain set standards is permitted.
Current: Only advertising that meets certain set standards is permitted.
Proposed: Only governmental organisation advertising is permitted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:40:08, December 24, 2008 CET | From | United Føderale League (NUC-DMF) | To | Debating the H+ Economics 1 |
| Message | OOC: Ok honestly the vast number of seperate bills is starting to become irritating and timewasting, I'm loosing the patience to go through all of them voting, my internet connection is not rocket speed |
| Date | 23:59:30, December 24, 2008 CET | From | H+ Paradigm | To | Debating the H+ Economics 1 |
| Message | OOC: Very well. I only do it this way because no parties will vote for any of my bills if I combine all proposals together. Since I am the only one that proposes bills, we will never get anything changed. I like actually having bills pass occasionally; but will return to multi-proposal bills since someone has asked. |
| Date | 00:05:05, December 25, 2008 CET | From | H+ Paradigm | To | Debating the H+ Economics 1 |
| Message | OOC: Also, since we have such a low proposal quota, I'd have to leave a bill in debate for a while in order to complete a legislative section (military, health, etc). |
| Date | 12:55:14, December 26, 2008 CET | From | United Føderale League (NUC-DMF) | To | Debating the H+ Economics 1 |
| Message | OOC: Having a bill in debate is not always a bad thing |
| Date | 20:29:56, December 26, 2008 CET | From | H+ Paradigm | To | Debating the H+ Economics 1 |
| Message | Yes, it is. I'm not changing my positions; other parties will either vote yes or they will vote no. I'm not going to debate the issue(s) with them. Taking time to debate bills also decreases the number of bills that can finish voting before the next election. |
| Date | 23:50:14, December 26, 2008 CET | From | United Føderale League (NUC-DMF) | To | Debating the H+ Economics 1 |
| Message | No, but it allows for large bills to be compromised, that's what it's for |
| Date | 01:22:45, December 27, 2008 CET | From | H+ Paradigm | To | Debating the H+ Economics 1 |
| Message | I have no intention of compromising. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 308 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 253 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: It usually takes up to an hour for election results to generate. During this time, the "Next Election" date is put forward a month, which is confusing. Do not worry! In a short time, the election result will generate and the "Next Election" date will then correct itself. |
| Random quote: "Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone." - John Maynard Keynes |