We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Property Rights act of 2122
Details
Submitted by[?]: Jakanian Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2124
Description[?]:
| An act to increase property rights |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent domain compensation (if eminent domain is legal).
Old value:: The government does not compensate victims of eminent domain.
Current: The government determines compensation for victims of eminent domain; victims can sue if they deem it unfair.
Proposed: A neutral body appointed by the courts determines the compensation, either party may appeal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning gated communities.
Old value:: No gated communities are allowed.
Current: No gated communities are allowed.
Proposed: The private sector can set up gated communities.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:18:12, October 09, 2005 CET | From | Nudist Party of United Jakania | To | Debating the Property Rights act of 2122 |
| Message | The NP would agree to this |
| Date | 14:25:30, October 09, 2005 CET | From | Jakanian Liberal Socialists | To | Debating the Property Rights act of 2122 |
| Message | The JLSP believes the owner of property should be able to set the compensation for eminent domain, with the government having the ability to appeal. The property owner should always have the higher ground on issues of eminent domain. If the JLSP wasn't so evil, we'd support the scrapping of Eminent Domain altogether. We wholly oppose the latter article though. Gated communities will set dangerous trends, and worsen already existent racial, ideological and economic gaps in society. No area of Jakania should be designated off-limits to a person merely because of their income, race, or any other kind of prerequisite these communities may set. |
| Date | 16:39:46, October 09, 2005 CET | From |  Islamic Nationalist Front | To | Debating the Property Rights act of 2122 |
| Message | The LP will back this bill. |
| Date | 00:56:37, October 10, 2005 CET | From | Jakanian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Property Rights act of 2122 |
| Message | heh, Gates Communities are a right. If someone wants to set up or live in a gated community that is their perogative, stop moralizing the population. |
| Date | 14:18:59, October 10, 2005 CET | From | Jakanian Liberal Socialists | To | Debating the Property Rights act of 2122 |
| Message | (hoho, very funny. This isn't about morals though, this is about people being able to live freely without being prejudged and without being excluded based on assinine criteria.) |
| Date | 15:52:26, October 10, 2005 CET | From | Jakanian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Property Rights act of 2122 |
| Message | what about people's right to have prejudices? |
| Date | 15:52:29, October 10, 2005 CET | From | Jakanian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Property Rights act of 2122 |
| Message | what about people's right to have prejudices? |
| Date | 20:10:42, October 10, 2005 CET | From | Jakanian Liberal Socialists | To | Debating the Property Rights act of 2122 |
| Message | (that's cool, we'll throw in the people's right for them to attack their neighbours with it.) |
| Date | 19:37:08, October 11, 2005 CET | From | Jakanian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Property Rights act of 2122 |
| Message | prejudice by definition stays inside the mind. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 162 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 63 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 25 |
| Random fact: To see what other nations are up to and to actively involve yourself in international activities: check the Roleplaying section on the forum! Don't be shy to make a news post about your party's recent achievements. |
| Random quote: "A dictatorship is a country where they have taken the politics out of politics." - Sam Himmell |