We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: KP.2690.02: Wild animals are not pets
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kommunistiska Partiet
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2691
Description[?]:
The Communists ask the Stortinget to consider the fact that pets are domesticated animals in the first place: loyal to mankind, helping him, &c. This bond has grown from a relationship which goes back hundreds, nay, even thousands of years! What companionship do wild animals offer? They do not know of the special relationship between mankind and a few domesticated animals! They are kept entirely against their will, and also frequently are a serious threat to children, neighbours, &c. We propose to do away with this contradictory legislation. Signed Comrade Jadwigus VAN TOORN Politburo |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of wild animals as pets.
Old value:: The government maintains a list of dangerous wild animals which may not be kept as pets; other wild animals may be kept as pets.
Current: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Proposed: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:46:07, January 02, 2009 CET | From | Mitten Partiet | To | Debating the KP.2690.02: Wild animals are not pets |
Message | The same act there VOTED down yestoday! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 192 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 311 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 58 |
Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
Random quote: "Unlike the world of free-markets, in political government when some individuals win, other individuals lose." - Robert Klassen |