We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Economic Stimulus Bill of 2690
Details
Submitted by[?]: Lodamese Worker's Royalist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2691
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Sales tax on luxury goods.
Old value:: 23
Current: 25
Proposed: 0
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 09:37:46, January 03, 2009 CET | From | National Royalist Front | To | Debating the Economic Stimulus Bill of 2690 |
Message | It'll take away revenue but the income tax breaks will cover it. |
Date | 05:45:48, January 04, 2009 CET | From | Lodamese Worker's Royalist Party | To | Debating the Economic Stimulus Bill of 2690 |
Message | It will stimulate the economy hopefully. The reduction of corporate taxes will also help stimulate the economy |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
abstain |
Total Seats: 100 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "The avoidance of taxes is the only intellectual pursuit that still carries any reward." - John Maynard Keynes |