We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: SDP Drug Freedom Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2693
Description[?]:
new bill |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of cannabis for medicinal purposes.
Old value:: The medicinal use of cannabis is illegal.
Current: Cannabis is legal as a sedative for patients in pain.
Proposed: Cannabis is legal as a sedative for patients in pain.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The recreational drug policy.
Old value:: Recreational drug use is forbidden.
Current: All naturally occurring drugs are legal.
Proposed: All naturally occurring drugs are legal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 09:58:08, January 07, 2009 CET | From | Red Star Movement | To | Debating the SDP Drug Freedom Act |
Message | Whilst we do not agree fully with article 2, we feel article 1 has enough power to persuade us to vote yes. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 262 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 239 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "You know what's interesting about Washington? It's the kind of place where second-guessing has become second nature." - George W. Bush |