Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 01:10:30
Server time: 06:49:29, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Changing the Title of the Emperor Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Classical Liberal Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2694

Description[?]:

An act to change the title of the Emperor Elect.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:24:37, January 07, 2009 CET
From Classical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Changing the Title of the Emperor Act
MessageThe Conservative Party believes that the title of Emperor is much more appropriate and correct than the title of Emperor Elect.

Date22:26:05, January 07, 2009 CET
From Classical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Changing the Title of the Emperor Act
MessageThis of course shall in no way effect the democratic and symbolic nature of the office of the head of state.

Date02:24:25, January 08, 2009 CET
From Centrist Party of Hobrazia
ToDebating the Changing the Title of the Emperor Act
MessageThank you for resurrecting an old bill of ours.

Date09:05:35, January 08, 2009 CET
From We Say So! Party
ToDebating the Changing the Title of the Emperor Act
MessageWe don't see any requirement for this. The position of Emperor is an elected one and the current name allows the differentiation from a heriditary one.

Date18:08:19, January 08, 2009 CET
From First Party Of Hobrazia
ToDebating the Changing the Title of the Emperor Act
MessageWe do believe in both arguements for naming the head of state. We are at present inclined towards Emperor for its simplicity

Date20:11:54, January 09, 2009 CET
From Classical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Changing the Title of the Emperor Act
MessagePrecisely, Emperor is more simplistic. I don't think we are that desperate to distinguish the position from a hereditary one, the office of the Emperor Elect is very well known.

Date12:42:12, January 10, 2009 CET
From We Say So! Party
ToDebating the Changing the Title of the Emperor Act
MessageJust because something is simplistic doesn't make it better.

Date12:43:13, January 10, 2009 CET
From We Say So! Party
ToDebating the Changing the Title of the Emperor Act
MessageAlso, we are the only nation on Terra with an Emperor Elect rather than a "simple" Emperor, why be uniform like every other nation?

Date20:25:50, January 10, 2009 CET
From Classical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Changing the Title of the Emperor Act
MessageAs I said, Emperor Elect is not exactly correct word use, usually referring to a statesman who has been elected but has not yet taken office.
Why not be uniform, why is there such a quest to be unique? I would understand it with other things, but this? Anyway, most Hobrazians refer to the Emperor Elect as Emperor.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 233

no
  

Total Seats: 167

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: When elections in a country are held, all bills in the voting phase are reset to the debate phase.

    Random quote: "There are people in the world so hungry that God cannot appear to them except in the form of bread." - Mahatma Gandhi

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 62