Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5471
Next month in: 01:57:30
Server time: 10:02:29, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): itsjustgav | JWDL | RogueGAD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Religious Morality Act of 2693

Details

Submitted by[?]: Constitutionalist Imperial League (IA)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2694

Description[?]:

We must promote and protect our traditional values and stand against abortion and severly regulate adoption.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:21:28, January 09, 2009 CET
FromLuthori Spiritual Secularist Society
ToDebating the Religious Morality Act of 2693
MessageMr. Speaker,

As dealers of death, religions have no right or authority to dictate what is moral and what is not. People may do ANYTHING (except murder or following an organised religion) they want to as long as it is contained to their own private lives.

I yield.

Date17:02:41, January 09, 2009 CET
FromRussian Tempest Party
ToDebating the Religious Morality Act of 2693
MessageMr. Speaker,

The RtP only agrees with one of these policies and the third is definitely not one of them. We are at a point in time where important decisions can be made by our loved ones and if this happens to be sacrifice one life to save two, then there should be no reason to make this illegal. This fact alone dictates my decision.

I yield.

Date17:23:17, January 09, 2009 CET
FromConstitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
ToDebating the Religious Morality Act of 2693
MessageMr. Speaker,

I ask the Spiritualist Society, if they believe people may do anything unless harm another person, why cant citizens be part of an organized religion? Religion is a great comfort to many of His majesty's subjects, why would the the LSSP wish to deprive them from this comfort? We ask the RTP which article they support, so that we may repropose it in the future.

I yield

Date20:33:42, January 09, 2009 CET
FromRussian Tempest Party
ToDebating the Religious Morality Act of 2693
MessageThe RtP agrees with article 2

Date20:34:00, January 09, 2009 CET
FromRussian Tempest Party
ToDebating the Religious Morality Act of 2693
MessageThe RtP agrees with article 2

Date20:52:47, January 09, 2009 CET
FromLuthori Spiritual Secularist Society
ToDebating the Religious Morality Act of 2693
MessageMr. Speaker,

To the honourable member from the League, The Society feels that because organised religion always equals death and murder that it is obvious why the people can not be allowed to participate in organised religion. We believe that if a person wants to follow a religion than they must do it by themselves in their own home with absolutely no practicing of said religion in the public world.

Date20:52:47, January 09, 2009 CET
FromLuthori Spiritual Secularist Society
ToDebating the Religious Morality Act of 2693
MessageMr. Speaker,

To the honourable member from the League, The Society feels that because organised religion always equals death and murder that it is obvious why the people can not be allowed to participate in organised religion. We believe that if a person wants to follow a religion than they must do it by themselves in their own home with absolutely no practicing of said religion in the public world.

Date20:54:06, January 09, 2009 CET
FromLuthori Spiritual Secularist Society
ToDebating the Religious Morality Act of 2693
Messageooc: oops, thought i pressed delete not enter.

ic: I yield

Date20:59:13, January 09, 2009 CET
FromHonesty, Legacy and Equality
ToDebating the Religious Morality Act of 2693
MessageMr. Speaker,
The HLE is firmly founded in the belief that homosexuality is the best way forward, a measure to eliminate the rights of homosexuals who wish to adopt children is abhorrent and will not find support within this party. That being said, so long as the tests to be administered under the second provision of this bill are fair and discriminatory only so as to root out those unsuitable of being parents, the party could support support such a measure.

Date23:34:58, January 09, 2009 CET
FromImperial Conservative Union (IA)
ToDebating the Religious Morality Act of 2693
MessageTo the Diet

I shall not cast my vote, however I am sure this Diet remembers how Progressive of an Emperor I am, and remembers that we must maintain a balance. If we are to continue our ever expanding Empire, then we must continue to rule wisely.

-Emperor Henry I

Date08:39:43, January 10, 2009 CET
FromConstitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
ToDebating the Religious Morality Act of 2693
MessageMr. Speaker,

We thank the honourable delegates of the LSSS, RTP, HLE and the Imperial Court for their indications on which articles they would support. As it has much apparent support within the Diet, we will repropose article 2 in the future. The League furthermore believes that in order for our Empire to prosper, we must progressively return to traditional values.

I yield.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
     

Total Seats: 200

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: All role-play must respect the established cultural background in Culturally Protected nations.

Random quote: "You don't have to explain something you never said." - Calvin Coolidge

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 82