Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 00:55:53
Server time: 19:04:06, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AethanKal | Paulo Nogueira | RogueALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of July 2695

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Alliance

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2696

Description[?]:

Our current Minister of Defence, HRH Prince George, 4th Duke of Utagia, wants to retire from politics.

We do also welcome the Constitutionalist Imperial League to our Imperial Cabinet.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:06:43, January 13, 2009 CET
FromConstitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2695
MessageMr. Speaker,

The League would be most honored to take part in the Imperial cabinet and greatly thanks the RAP for their most generous proposal.

I yield.

Date20:20:13, January 13, 2009 CET
FromImperial Conservative Union (IA)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2695
MessageI would like to say, that any of the other parties will be welcome, if they promise to continue the monarchy. That really is the only requirement to be in the IA.

Date20:46:31, January 13, 2009 CET
FromHonesty, Legacy and Equality
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2695
MessageWhilst we have no problem with the continuation of the monarchy and will strive for the status quo insofar as that area is concerned, it is disheartening that you would not include either the LSSS or the PDP.
Perhaps they have made anti-imperial overtures of which I am currently unaware?

Date01:36:04, January 14, 2009 CET
FromImperial Conservative Union (IA)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2695
MessageThe largest party, as the people's elected HoG, has the right to make the Cabinet as he sees fit. I was just reminding people of that.

Date08:17:32, January 15, 2009 CET
FromLiberal Alliance
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2695
MessageWhen you don't want to ban all forms of religion you are very welcome to the cabinet, old chap. (Hon/Leg/Eq)

Date18:51:33, January 17, 2009 CET
FromHonesty, Legacy and Equality
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2695
MessageOh.
We don't actually want to be in the cabinet.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 121

no
   

Total Seats: 73

abstain
 

Total Seats: 6


Random fact: It is the collective responsibility of the players in a nation to ensure all currently binding RP laws are clearly outlined in an OOC reference bill in the "Bills under debate" section of the nation page. Confusion should not be created by displaying only some of the current RP laws or displaying RP laws which are no longer current.

Random quote: "If we cannot, by reason, by influence, by example, by strenuous effort, and by personal sacrifice, mend the bad places of civilization, we certainly cannot do it by force." - Auberon Herbert

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 57