We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Privacy Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Nuovi Socialdemocratici
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2696
Description[?]:
| Our main goal is to give Vanukunians civil rights back. In this act we propose two simple actions to get citizens more free. First, total abolition of death penalty, whatever the crime. (BY NOW CANCELLED) Second, the right for the citizens to hold information secret (privacy reform). |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Current: The government has the right to monitor information of individuals without letting them know.
Proposed: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:08:09, January 14, 2009 CET | From |  Nuovi Socialdemocratici | To | Debating the Privacy Act |
| Message | I'd like to build on a debate on my proposals, hoping that they won't be struck just for spirit of opposition :-) I accept critics and suggestions, and let's try to find a compromise. |
| Date | 17:58:14, January 14, 2009 CET | From | De Communistische Partij Van Vanuku | To | Debating the Privacy Act |
| Message | I don't support abolition of the death penalty. The penal system has been proven to not work the way it should in many countries. For example the dealth penalty was very important in the Nuremberg Trials after WW2 in Germany, the Nazi leaders got a just and deserved painful death for their crimes against humanity. This bill will do the same if such horrible crimes against humanity are perpetrated. I will always support the death penalty. Privacy is perfectly alright, but let's not diminish the power of our judges to do their jobs. Some imformation is vital to a case, we cannot allow people to refuse to help our lawmen and women. |
| Date | 07:00:43, January 15, 2009 CET | From | Universal Front | To | Debating the Privacy Act |
| Message | It is our opinion that the death penalty should remain an option in instances where the criminal consents to the infliction of such a punishment. As the bill currently stands, we support it in full. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 115 |
| Random fact: Culturally Open nations can adopt advisory/non-enforceable Nation Descriptions. See http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6242 |
| Random quote: "Impossible is a word to be found only in the dictionary of fools." - Napoleon Bonaparte |