We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Efficiency Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kazari Militarist Movement
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2699
Description[?]:
To allow greater use of PMCs and private contractors. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the export of weapons to other nations.
Old value:: The government must approve all arms sales on a case by case basis.
Current: The government must approve all arms sales on a case by case basis.
Proposed: The government allows all arms to be exported freely.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:32:55, January 19, 2009 CET | From | Rutanian Restoration Party | To | Debating the Military Efficiency Bill |
Message | We agree with Article 1 but we cannot vote for this bill due to Article 2. We do not want Rutanian arms being sold to just anyone. |
Date | 17:21:21, January 19, 2009 CET | From | National Equality Party | To | Debating the Military Efficiency Bill |
Message | We will not support this bill. The nation needs some nationalized Defense. Also, we would not like Rutanian arms being sold to whomever wishes to buy them. If some international terrorist attack happened and they were found to be using Rutanian arms, which they legally bought, how would that look on the national scale? |
Date | 20:30:05, January 19, 2009 CET | From | Imperium Party | To | Debating the Military Efficiency Bill |
Message | We are against this proposal of removing our national defence industry. A lot of money has gone into the defence budget in reason years. Additionally the IP are oppose to any private companies. The suggestion proposed by our right honourable gentleman of allowing arms to be exported freely is at null. Together with private industies giving arms to terrorist organisations is a bad direction to go to. I can say that the IP do not support this bill. Iain Angel Minister of Defence |
Date | 21:27:26, January 19, 2009 CET | From | Kazari Militarist Movement | To | Debating the Military Efficiency Bill |
Message | I like to make a statement that our PMCs have performed well, and some of them have even out-performed the typical national soldier. If the Orange agrees to article one, we will draft a similar bill with article two removed, but for the time being, for the spirit of democracy and republic, we will place this bill up to vote. -Michael Zheng, chairman of the Kazari corporate initiative. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 125 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 474 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: "Jezvraljogadsrlji" means "Social" in the Jelbic languages. |
Random quote: "I realize that a life predicated on being obedient and taking orders is a very comfortable life indeed. Living in such a way reduces to a minimum one's need to think." - Adolf Eichmann |