We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of September 2698
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2700
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Kébé Front
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Federal Alliance
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the jet Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Kébé Front
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Leftist Blue Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Leftist Blue Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Federal Alliance
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Kébé Front
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Federal Alliance
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the jet Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Kébé Front
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the People's Political Power Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the People's Political Power Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:46:13, January 19, 2009 CET | From | Kébé Front | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2698 |
| Message | Why should we share power when we hold all of the peoples' support? |
| Date | 02:36:08, January 20, 2009 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2698 |
| Message | This debate is now rather redundant. |
| Date | 23:20:49, January 22, 2009 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2698 |
| Message | As some of these parties are inactive, it's unfair to direct powers to them... |
| Date | 21:02:20, January 23, 2009 CET | From | Gharki Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2698 |
| Message | I see that you have forgotten about Divide By Zero, even though we have only just founded, oh well, we agree with Al'Badara Akbar's stance on this. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 75 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Under every stone lurks a politician." Aristophanes (450 BC - 388 BC), Thesmophoriazusae, 410 B.C |