We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 2699
Details
Submitted by[?]: Neo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2699
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Neo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Free thinking Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Neo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Liberal Conservatists
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Neo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Free thinking Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Liberal Conservatists
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Neo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Neo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Liberal Conservatists
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Neo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Free thinking Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Free thinking Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:57:16, January 20, 2009 CET | From | Neo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2699 |
| Message | Seeing as the LCW have resigned from their positions in the cabinet we thought it neccessary to fill these. We have only included parties with seats because the others hold no sway in voting. When other parties gain seats we can consider giving them a place in the cabinet. |
| Date | 16:11:33, January 20, 2009 CET | From | United Workers | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2699 |
| Message | Believe that the next coelition should be made after the next election, when there is more chance for the newer parties to have some say in the running of the nation |
| Date | 20:07:55, January 20, 2009 CET | From | Christian Democrat Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2699 |
| Message | This party votes yes, but proposes that these positions be reconsidered if any new parties gain seats in the forthcoming elections |
| Date | 10:05:18, January 21, 2009 CET | From | The Likatonian Imperium party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2699 |
| Message | i have to agree with the pricipality of Linkon |
| Date | 17:38:49, January 21, 2009 CET | From | Neo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2699 |
| Message | We will reconsider after the next election if other parties gain a significant amount of seats. |
| Date | 18:01:15, January 21, 2009 CET | From | TW@ | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2699 |
| Message | That is good |
| Date | 18:06:59, January 21, 2009 CET | From | TW@ | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2699 |
| Message | That is good |
| Date | 18:07:34, January 21, 2009 CET | From | TW@ | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2699 |
| Message | sorry double post |
| Date | 18:34:28, January 21, 2009 CET | From | Free thinking Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2699 |
| Message | i do not understand why the smaller parties are voting no, they would have no members in the cabinet anyway as they hold no majority |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 458 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 207 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663 |
| Random quote: "What are you trying to protect heterosexual marriages from? There isn't a limited amount of love in Iowa. It isn't a non-renewable resource. If Amy and Barbara or Mike and Steve love each other, it doesn't mean that John and Mary can't." - Ed Fallon |