Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 00:09:00
Server time: 15:50:59, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Royal Marriages, 2699

Details

Submitted by[?]: Hessexian Arab Royalists

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2701

Description[?]:

Upon passage of this bill, and realising that the important step of securing the monarchy in Quanzar requires the production of strong heirs to the throne, Parliament hereby give its official blessing to the marriages of His Majesty Edward the first's two children, HRH Crown Princess Margaret and HRH Prince James.

1. Crown Princess Margaret (b. 2680) - Saad Khoury (b. 2677)
2. Prince James (b. 2682) - Archduchess Magdelena of Hulstria (b. 2684)

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:32:38, January 21, 2009 CET
FromQuanzari Restorationists
ToDebating the Royal Marriages, 2699
MessageA slippery slope, especially with the Italians.

Date20:16:49, January 21, 2009 CET
FromHessexian Arab Royalists
ToDebating the Royal Marriages, 2699
MessageIf they disagree then fine, but we are adamant about the Arab husband of the heir to the throne.

Date20:18:51, January 21, 2009 CET
FromQuanzari Restorationists
ToDebating the Royal Marriages, 2699
MessageWe have no problem with Arab integration.

Date05:43:35, January 22, 2009 CET
FromCoalizione di Chierici Islamica
ToDebating the Royal Marriages, 2699
MessageWe propose that Margaret marry an Arab, but that upon marraige the couple convert to Islam.
While we will accept that James marry an Italian but remain Orthodox Catholic.

Date06:53:34, January 22, 2009 CET
FromOrder of the Golden Crown
ToDebating the Royal Marriages, 2699
MessageWe oppose the Italian match, but strongly support the Arab one.

The religious issue is bound to be problematic. As a supporter of the Orthodox Catholic Church, we simply cannot accept the creation of an exclusively Muslim line of succession. Let's just leave the issue of religion alone for now-- let us leave the matter up to the Monarchs and heirs themselves; in essence, let us ignore the matter for the sake of peace in the realm.

Date07:22:55, January 22, 2009 CET
FromHessexian Arab Royalists
ToDebating the Royal Marriages, 2699
MessageSo who should we pair James with?

Date17:06:38, January 22, 2009 CET
FromQuanzari Restorationists
ToDebating the Royal Marriages, 2699
MessageWe will never support a muslim wearing crown, and we would never recognize such a person as monarch.

Date17:08:03, January 22, 2009 CET
FromQuanzari Restorationists
ToDebating the Royal Marriages, 2699
MessagePerhaps James can marry into the Xpanius dynasty in Saridan. They're still around and in control, though House Xpanius no longer has a monarchy.

Date17:09:01, January 22, 2009 CET
FromQuanzari Restorationists
ToDebating the Royal Marriages, 2699
Message(Saridan is Swiss and nominally Protestant)

Date17:37:17, January 22, 2009 CET
FromHessexian Arab Royalists
ToDebating the Royal Marriages, 2699
MessageOr we could marry him off to the Hulstrian family -- I know the monarchist party there.

Also, the law doesn't allow a Muslim to take the throne: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=233173

Date23:09:55, January 22, 2009 CET
From Conservative Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Royal Marriages, 2699
MessageOOC: Be sure to tell me when you marry them off Francis, I'll update your tree.

Date04:12:57, January 23, 2009 CET
FromOrder of the Golden Crown
ToDebating the Royal Marriages, 2699
MessageWe support the Hulstrian proposition-- they have among the most stable monarchies around.

Date04:49:15, January 23, 2009 CET
FromHessexian Arab Royalists
ToDebating the Royal Marriages, 2699
MessageHulstria recommends Archduchess Magdelena(b 2684), the great granddaughter of Heinrich I, and the sister of the likely successor to their throne.

As for the Margaret, Saad Khoury seems to have caught her eye. He is the son of the richest Arab in Quanzar, Mohammad Khoury, who is known for developing his family's corporate culture in hugely successful construction projects throughout the region and is also a significant supporter of philanthropic activities in Quanzar and elsewhere.

Date05:10:01, January 23, 2009 CET
FromHessexian Arab Royalists
ToDebating the Royal Marriages, 2699
MessageAs a side note, Archduchess Magdelena's brother is married to Victor Kansar's daughter, Catherine.

Date05:11:00, January 23, 2009 CET
FromCoalizione di Chierici Islamica
ToDebating the Royal Marriages, 2699
MessageIf Margaret marries an Arab Muslim our party will throw down all Republican tendancies and become a Muslim party that streches across all ethnic lines and support the existence of Quanzar.

Date05:22:22, January 23, 2009 CET
FromHessexian Arab Royalists
ToDebating the Royal Marriages, 2699
MessageThen Saad Khoury can be a Muslim, but Margaret cannot convert.

Date06:50:33, January 25, 2009 CET
FromQuanzari Restorationists
ToDebating the Royal Marriages, 2699
MessageWe will never support the wogs.

Date06:51:10, January 25, 2009 CET
FromQuanzari Restorationists
ToDebating the Royal Marriages, 2699
Messagesorry wrong bill

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 395

no
   

Total Seats: 144

abstain
 

Total Seats: 60


Random fact: When forming a cabinet, try to include as few parties as possible, while still obtaining a majority of the seats.

Random quote: "Any system that takes responsibility away from people, dehumanises them." - Author Unknown

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 74