Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 02:59:16
Server time: 17:00:43, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): ADM Drax | Archangel_1 | HopesFor | hyraemous | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: BIG change

Details

Submitted by[?]: Neo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2703

Description[?]:

big change

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:21:40, January 22, 2009 CET
FromNeo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika
ToDebating the BIG change
MessageWe like controversial bills, and this must surely be up there at the top of the list. Any ideas on this? Although i can already anticipate what some parties will say about this.

Date21:36:49, January 22, 2009 CET
FromChristian Democrat Party
ToDebating the BIG change
MessageThe CDP agrees with the proposal and believes it makes sense for the Head of State to also be the Head of Government, unless to keep the tradition of a monarchy etc. Will this proposal make the current Head of State, Head of Government or vice versa?

Date22:21:22, January 22, 2009 CET
FromUnited Workers
ToDebating the BIG change
MessageWe agree with this, as if we are to develope as a country, we need to ensure that all leaders are entirely voted in, as this will allow the people to have the control over their country to the maximum.
Though our vote doesn't, as yet count for anything, it will be in favour of the 'big change'.

Date22:44:43, January 22, 2009 CET
FromThe Likatonian Imperium party
ToDebating the BIG change
Messagesame here but will that this make us lose our monarchy because i would then show concern.

Date23:17:46, January 22, 2009 CET
FromLiberal Conservatists
ToDebating the BIG change
MessageThis bill is not desirable in our eyes. The monarchy is something we should be proud of and not throw it away. We do not agree.

Date19:40:29, January 23, 2009 CET
FromThe Likatonian Imperium party
ToDebating the BIG change
MessageApon realising that this will see the end of our monarchy (one of which is constitutinal) i have to disagree with this bill.

I see this as an attack on our culture and cannot support. This is also against the constitution of our nation.

Date20:14:15, January 23, 2009 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the BIG change
MessageWe don't have a monarchy...Merely a hereditary president :-)

Date13:21:06, January 25, 2009 CET
FromThe Likatonian Imperium party
ToDebating the BIG change
Messageoh. Well we should change the name as a hereditary president just sounds weird.

any way it also goes against my party doctrine

Date14:24:12, January 26, 2009 CET
FromNeo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika
ToDebating the BIG change
MessageWe presumed that the LCW would be thoroughly against this, are you?

Date20:11:29, January 26, 2009 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the BIG change
MessageWe would support, reluctantly. We could be persuaded to support enthusiatically if there was a return to the traditional title of Emissary.

Date20:33:38, January 26, 2009 CET
FromNeo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika
ToDebating the BIG change
MessageIf this bill were to be passed we would of course give the position of head of government/ head of state to the largest party. However we shall wait to hear from the Free Thinking Party first before we consider putting this bill or a similar to it to vote.

Date19:45:27, January 27, 2009 CET
FromFree thinking Party
ToDebating the BIG change
MessageIt makes sense to consolidate the two roles, especially if the hereditary role is meaningless, not even a tourist attraction as it is not a monarch-like role, we would therefore support this bill

Date20:43:29, January 28, 2009 CET
FromChristian Democrat Party
ToDebating the BIG change
MessageEmissary???? I'd feel sorry for whoever has to carry that title.

Date22:15:50, January 28, 2009 CET
FromTW@
ToDebating the BIG change
MessageThe TW@ party disagrees

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 532

no
   

Total Seats: 133

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364

    Random quote: "Capitalism and communism stand at opposite poles. Their essential difference is this: the communist, seeing the rich man and his fine home, says: 'No man should have so much.' The capitalist, seeing the same thing, says: 'All men should have as much.'" - Phelps Adams

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 92