We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Forest Management Act of 2700
Details
Submitted by[?]: Green Party of Aldegar
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2701
Description[?]:
Various measures for more effective forest management. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: There is a national agency which exists side-by-side with commercial forestry companies.
Current: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Proposed: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: The government has no policy on forest protection.
Current: Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks.
Proposed: Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on tree plantation.
Old value:: The government requires tree plantation at replacement level for all logging or clearance operations.
Current: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Proposed: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 09:51:00, January 23, 2009 CET | From | Worker's Council Defence Committee | To | Debating the Forest Management Act of 2700 |
Message | Supporting for now, though I would prefer a national forest agency and think that article 2 goes too far, wood is a fairly important resource and this virtually bans it's use. |
Date | 09:52:23, January 23, 2009 CET | From | Worker's Council Defence Committee | To | Debating the Forest Management Act of 2700 |
Message | Changed my mind, voting no, will introduce my own forestry bill soon. |
Date | 08:36:47, January 24, 2009 CET | From | Imperial Identity Party (IA) | To | Debating the Forest Management Act of 2700 |
Message | Art. 2 is mad. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 215 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 347 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow role-play that seems to belong to the world of fantasy, science fiction and futuristic speculation. |
Random quote: "The substance of the eminent Socialist gentlemen's speech is that making a profit is a sin. It is my belief that the real sin is taking a loss!" - Winston Churchill |