Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5461
Next month in: 03:04:10
Server time: 16:55:49, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): FireboyUK | LuaBaltusia | Mbites2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Taxation of religious institutions.

Details

Submitted by[?]: Rutanian Elitist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2703

Description[?]:

Article 1:
Actual legislation: No religions are taxed.

Proposed legislation: Religions are treated as companies, and all profit is taxed, however, charitable donations are not taxed.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:24:48, January 25, 2009 CET
From Rutanian Elitist Party
ToDebating the Taxation of religious institutions.
MessageThe National Party of the Elites considers that the Commonwealth of Rutania provides a most liberal legal framework for the functioning of every religion. This fact is regarded by the NPE as a benevolent act and in accordance with the Commonwealth's fundamental values. However in the NPE's opinion every Church is organic part of our nation thus they have the obligation to contribute to the Commowealth's prosperity. Provided that the state is not in a very favourable economic situation, the NPE proposes this new form of taxation. The party's good intentions are revealed by the proposal that donations should not be taxed, only other profits.

Lord Klausenburg,
Chairman of NPE

Date04:41:51, January 26, 2009 CET
From National Equality Party
ToDebating the Taxation of religious institutions.
MessageThe NEP are against the taxation of religious institutions. Although we may be in the negative profits wise, there is already a proposal, backed by the major parties, increase taxes elsewhere and reduce spending. This tax is unjust tax. This is like taxing people's ideas. We will fight this bill at all costs.

Date05:43:54, January 26, 2009 CET
From Rutanian Restoration Party
ToDebating the Taxation of religious institutions.
MessageWe at the Orange Party agree with the National Equality Party. Religious institutions should be treated as any other non-profit organization. This tax is unnecessary and could possibly be construed as government interference into religion.

Date20:44:45, January 26, 2009 CET
From Rutanian Elitist Party
ToDebating the Taxation of religious institutions.
MessageThis proposal would not interfere in the life of the religions but in the life of the Churches. The NPE does not want to put an obstacle to religious freedom, but it believes that Churches must contribute to the welfare of the nation, because it is their interest too.

Lord Klausenburg
Chairman NPE

Date12:52:32, January 27, 2009 CET
From National Equality Party
ToDebating the Taxation of religious institutions.
MessageIt is not in their best interests to do so. Church's have a hard enough time as it is raising the money they need, especially with the rising popularity of Atheism in the world. Taxing churches will only push back their progress.

Date18:41:41, January 27, 2009 CET
From Rutanian Elitist Party
ToDebating the Taxation of religious institutions.
MessageThe NPE cannot understand how the OP and the NEP are not able to distinguish between religion and church... Their lack of knowledge might damage the country, but we hope that next time people will vote for competent parties...
The NPE will put forward this proposal for voting.

Lord Klausenburg,
Chairman, NPE

Date19:03:08, January 27, 2009 CET
From Imperium Party
ToDebating the Taxation of religious institutions.
MessageMr speaker, the government has long tried to stay out of the affairs of religion institutions and orders in Rutania. We prefer not to tax religious as the government does not need to interverne with their affairs, except of course if there are cults in which we must take action.

However, I'am tend to support this bill, to help boost the economy. We have many religions in the country at the moment, christianity, islam, jewish and of course the Church of Drunken Fighting and if all of these religions are taxed it would give a vital injection of capital to our economy which at the moment is low.

Veronica Zoratatt
IP Leader

Date04:23:35, January 28, 2009 CET
From Rutanian Restoration Party
ToDebating the Taxation of religious institutions.
MessageWhat is the definition of profit in the case of a church? It is clearly a non-profit organization. We understand the difference between religion and churches, churches operate as non-profit organizations--no profit. We don't see how a tax on religion would do anything but hurt the churches and create outcries against the government saying that we have become an anti-religion government. The two (church and religion) are different, we see your point. So why don't you go ahead and include a provision to tax all non-profits if you're going to tax churches?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 221

no
  

Total Seats: 378

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: "Spamming", or the indiscriminate posting of unsolicited messages, is not allowed.

    Random quote: "To retain respect for sausages and laws, one must not watch them in the making." - Otto von Bismarck

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 59