We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Sectioned Communities Provision 2124
Details
Submitted by[?]: Anti-Particracy and Unionist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2133
Description[?]:
We must allow for the wishes of adults to enter a closed community and also keep the collective government nose out of the affairs of religion. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning gated communities.
Old value:: No gated communities are allowed.
Current: No gated communities are allowed.
Proposed: The private sector can set up gated communities.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Remuneration of ministers of religion.
Old value:: Ministers of religion shall receive no remuneration whatsoever.
Current: The salaries and pensions of ministers of religions shall be regulated by the law, but shall be borne by the religious communities themselves.
Proposed: The state does not intervene in the remuneration of ministers of religion.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:29:58, October 11, 2005 CET | From | People's Democratic Party | To | Debating the Sectioned Communities Provision 2124 |
Message | Will supprot article 2, but not article 1. |
Date | 04:51:58, October 12, 2005 CET | From | Labor Party | To | Debating the Sectioned Communities Provision 2124 |
Message | We shall agree with this at the present. I unsure what sort of direction we are heading with these gated communitites in our Nation. |
Date | 01:17:29, October 26, 2005 CET | From | New Daio Party | To | Debating the Sectioned Communities Provision 2124 |
Message | And what, exactly, do these two proposals have in common? I side with PDP. |
Date | 01:36:28, October 29, 2005 CET | From | Labor Party | To | Debating the Sectioned Communities Provision 2124 |
Message | We are against this now, as dont wish gated religious communities. |
Date | 18:10:33, October 29, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Party | To | Debating the Sectioned Communities Provision 2124 |
Message | I would have to agree with the PDP. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 131 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 209 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 61 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to make a reasonable effort to be accurate when communicating the rules to other players. Any player who manipulatively misleads another player about the rules will be subject to sanction. |
Random quote: " A government which robs Peter to pay Paul, can always count on the support of Paul." - George Bernard Shaw |