We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Comprehensive Imperial Security Act of 2705
Details
Submitted by[?]: Constitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2707
Description[?]:
| Gated communities are sometimes necessary in certain areas, if so, there is no reason not to let private gated communities exist. There is no reason furthermore to waste tax payer pounds trying to "integrate" illegal immigrants. If found, these criminals must be sent back to the border from where they came. It is not the governemnt's place to use public funds to pay for the defence of private citizens as they have the right to defend themselves. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning gated communities.
Old value:: The government sets up gated communities.
Current: Both the government and the private sector can set up gated communities.
Proposed: Both the government and the private sector can set up gated communities.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change
The government's stance on illegal aliens.
Old value:: The government does not actively search for illegal aliens, but puts them in integration centers when discovered.
Current: The government actively searches houses for illegal aliens and expels them from the country.
Proposed: The government does not actively search for illegal aliens, but expels them from the country when discovered.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government provision of legal aid to the accused.
Old value:: Legal representation for defendants in criminal trials is paid for by the state.
Current: Legal representation for defendants in criminal trials is paid for by the state for defendants with low incomes.
Proposed: Legal representation is never paid for by the state.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:22:13, February 02, 2009 CET | From | Imperial Conservative Union (IA) | To | Debating the Comprehensive Imperial Security Act of 2705 |
| Message | Only agree with 1. |
| Date | 09:27:13, February 03, 2009 CET | From | Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Comprehensive Imperial Security Act of 2705 |
| Message | Agree with the lot, old chap. |
| Date | 09:38:17, February 03, 2009 CET | From | Liberal Democratic Party of Luthori | To | Debating the Comprehensive Imperial Security Act of 2705 |
| Message | Again, we support. |
| Date | 01:41:19, February 04, 2009 CET | From | Luthori Communist Party | To | Debating the Comprehensive Imperial Security Act of 2705 |
| Message | #1 and #2 are deal breakers. |
| Date | 01:20:13, February 05, 2009 CET | From | Imperial Conservative Union (IA) | To | Debating the Comprehensive Imperial Security Act of 2705 |
| Message | #1 and #2 I could live with, but three keeps me from saying yes. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 148 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 52 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy has 464 player slots. |
| Random quote: "Under every stone lurks a politician." Aristophanes (450 BC - 388 BC), Thesmophoriazusae, 410 B.C |