We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Reversal of tree replantation bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Christian Democrat Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2707
Description[?]:
We were not happy with the passing of this bill last time. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on tree plantation.
Old value:: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Current: The government does not intervene with regard to the replantation of trees.
Proposed: The government requires tree plantation at replacement level for all logging or clearance operations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:17:27, February 05, 2009 CET | From | Free thinking Party | To | Debating the Reversal of tree replantation bill |
Message | we agree with this one |
Date | 17:35:41, February 05, 2009 CET | From | TW@ | To | Debating the Reversal of tree replantation bill |
Message | boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo |
Date | 17:36:29, February 05, 2009 CET | From | TW@ | To | Debating the Reversal of tree replantation bill |
Message | we disagree It was just voted otherwise, you are being a stupid little boy. and i could always write you out of the chemistury work :) |
Date | 18:14:10, February 05, 2009 CET | From | Neo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika | To | Debating the Reversal of tree replantation bill |
Message | We will of course be voting yes for this. If this bill does get passed then it begs the question why did parties vote for earlier bill opposing this? We believe that there is currently too much political manoeuvring, parties seem to be more concerned about being on the winning side when it comes to bills and as a result seem to be failing to stand by what they really believe in. We may be wrong but that is how the situation looks to us. |
Date | 19:45:42, February 05, 2009 CET | From | Free thinking Party | To | Debating the Reversal of tree replantation bill |
Message | we did not vote on the last bill |
Date | 19:48:07, February 05, 2009 CET | From | Neo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika | To | Debating the Reversal of tree replantation bill |
Message | We know, we were speaking generally. |
Date | 20:33:11, February 05, 2009 CET | From | Christian Democrat Party | To | Debating the Reversal of tree replantation bill |
Message | The CDP would like to request twat to keep personal threats out of this bill. If they cannot argue their points with well balanced arguments, they deserve to have no place in our government. If any party is unsure which way to vote in this proposal, I would like to point them to arguments placed forward in the bill in which this original proposal was passed - especially the one by the NKRP. Please think carefully before voting, this bill is not as straightforward as some parties are making out. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 611 | |||||||
no |
Total Seats: 55 | |||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Particracy has been running since 2005. Dorvik was Particracy's first nation, the Dorvik Social Democrats the first party and the International Greens the first Party Organisation. |
Random quote: "The true revolutionary is guided by great feelings of love. It is impossible to think of a genuine revolutionary lacking this quality." - Che Guevara |