We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Regulation of Pharmaceuticals Industry Act 2124
Details
Submitted by[?]: Anti-Particracy and Unionist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2135
Description[?]:
It is time to stop rich drug companies from exploiting the poor and from selling over-priced drugs. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Pharmaceutical drugs policy.
Old value:: The government does not subsidise the cost of pharmaceutical drugs at all.
Current: The government pays for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs.
Proposed: The government pays partially for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs, and pays entirely for those of low income citizens.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:42:00, October 14, 2005 CET | From | Labor Party | To | Debating the Regulation of Pharmaceuticals Industry Act 2124 |
Message | Agreed. |
Date | 18:34:25, October 14, 2005 CET | From | People's Democratic Party | To | Debating the Regulation of Pharmaceuticals Industry Act 2124 |
Message | Will support. |
Date | 20:44:54, October 15, 2005 CET | From | Socialist Republic Party | To | Debating the Regulation of Pharmaceuticals Industry Act 2124 |
Message | i agree |
Date | 19:46:05, October 25, 2005 CET | From | Anti-Particracy and Unionist Party | To | Debating the Regulation of Pharmaceuticals Industry Act 2124 |
Message | The original Article 1 was removed, because the motion has been passed in my absence. |
Date | 21:46:16, October 25, 2005 CET | From | People's Democratic Party | To | Debating the Regulation of Pharmaceuticals Industry Act 2124 |
Message | Why do we have to pay for people who can afford them? We would have only supported the option of paying only for poor families. |
Date | 01:19:16, October 26, 2005 CET | From | New Daio Party | To | Debating the Regulation of Pharmaceuticals Industry Act 2124 |
Message | Agreed with PDP. There is no sense in providing free drugs for people on a living wage. |
Date | 07:09:48, October 26, 2005 CET | From | Roman Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Regulation of Pharmaceuticals Industry Act 2124 |
Message | Agreed with PDP and DPP |
Date | 20:41:34, October 30, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Party | To | Debating the Regulation of Pharmaceuticals Industry Act 2124 |
Message | Agreed with the three previous statements. |
Date | 14:16:39, November 02, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Party | To | Debating the Regulation of Pharmaceuticals Industry Act 2124 |
Message | We changed our mind. :-p |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 235 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 122 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 44 |
Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
Random quote: "Conservative, n: A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal who wishes to replace them with others." - Ambrose Bierce |