Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 01:42:46
Server time: 14:17:13, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): RossLuthori | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Intelligence Act of 2125

Details

Submitted by[?]: Islamic Nationalist Front

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2126

Description[?]:

A BILL to provide for an intelligence agency for counterintelligence and surveillance.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:17:48, October 14, 2005 CET
From Jakanian Conservative Party
ToDebating the Intelligence Act of 2125
MessageThis will be a welcome change to what the NP proposed.

Date12:33:54, October 14, 2005 CET
From Democratic Labour Union
ToDebating the Intelligence Act of 2125
MessageConsidering recent events we would be foolhardy to believe an intelligence agency to supplement and support our law enforcement agencies is not necessary. We welcome the suggestion by the JLP and would support this bill should it be brought to vote.

Date03:16:21, October 15, 2005 CET
From Nudist Party of United Jakania
ToDebating the Intelligence Act of 2125
MessageThis is a step in the right direction, so I can support it.

Date13:45:20, October 15, 2005 CET
From Jakanian Liberal Socialists
ToDebating the Intelligence Act of 2125
MessageThe JLSP opposes. Spying on other sovereign countries can not be justified, and the creation of another agency to protect our organisations and citizens will create added layers of bureacracy.

Counterintelligence we can see the benefit of, but we do not believe this merits the creation of another organisation. We reccomend instead that the powers to protect our people lie soley with the police force, even if this means broadening their operational objectives.

This would also eliminate many problems of communication between seperate agencies (OOC: such as those seen in the CIA/FBI/military comms breakdown leading up to 9/11)

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 147

no
 

Total Seats: 78

abstain
   

Total Seats: 25


Random fact: Moderation reserves the discretion to declare RP laws invalid if the players supporting them are doing so in an excessively confrontational way.

Random quote: "Idealism is fine; but as it approaches reality, the cost becomes prohibitive." - William F. Buckley, Jr.

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 60