Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5474
Next month in: 03:49:03
Server time: 08:10:56, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Change

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Workers

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2732

Description[?]:

...

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:03:22, March 26, 2009 CET
FromThe Likatonian Imperium party
ToDebating the Change
MessageWe cannot agree with articles 3 and 5.

Date19:42:20, March 26, 2009 CET
FromLiberal Conservatists
ToDebating the Change
MessageWe agree with Imperium Party.

Date20:36:52, March 26, 2009 CET
FromNeo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika
ToDebating the Change
MessageWe don't agree with article 1, as we have always said we believe that competition is good in this area of business which is why we believe private defence companies should exist, obviously we believe that there should be regulations on arms deals etc.
Article 2 sounds ok.
Article 3 is in our opinion a better law than we currently have, we have always supported military national service but we are beginning to understand that it is unfair to force everybody to partake in something which may not be in line with their conscience.
Article 4 we agree with, we believe that this nation should have a nuclear capability to act as a deterrant.
We do not agree with article 5, we believe that all prisoners of war should be treated fairly until their date of release or charge.

Overall we probably wouldn't vote for this law, mainly because of the first and last articles

Date20:43:26, March 26, 2009 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Change
MessageWe oppose the nuclear armament option.

We oppose the military service option.

We like the defence industry proposal, and wish it had been presented on it's own.

We oppose the POW option.

We support the intent of the landmine article, but feel it doesn't go far enough.


On balance, we are going to have to hold back on supporting. There are issues here we could have voted for, but they are outnumbered by issues we must oppose.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 218

no
     

Total Seats: 532

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English.

    Random quote: "The true destiny of America is religious, not political: it is spiritual, not physical." - Alvin R. Dyer

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 80