Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5472
Next month in: 01:09:44
Server time: 22:50:15, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): burgerboys | DanivonX | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: King's Loyal President

Details

Submitted by[?]: Pontesian Royalist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2736

Description[?]:

The king needs help.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:29:30, April 04, 2009 CET
From Muslim Association of Pontesi
ToDebating the King's Loyal President
MessageOOC: I don't think you can have a President and a King. You would need somebody to perform the Kings duties for him, a President typically replaces a Monarch.

Date12:38:53, April 04, 2009 CET
From Pontesian Royalist Party
ToDebating the King's Loyal President
MessageOOC: What do you recommend?

Date12:57:49, April 04, 2009 CET
From Muslim Association of Pontesi
ToDebating the King's Loyal President
MessageOOC: Viceroy I think gets used most often. You could also have Governor General (as is used in Canada and Australia), Lord Lieutenant was used in Ireland, but I'm not sure if that would make sense in all cases. General Supervisor-Protector was used in Imperial China, but generally its just translated Governor General as well.

IC: We remain to be convinced that a representative of the King is neccessary. We believe continuing to vest power in the Grand-Vizier General may be a better situation.

Date16:00:05, April 04, 2009 CET
From Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the King's Loyal President
MessageWe see no reason to used a direct democracy for the position of head of government and believe that the current representative democracy with the Grand-Vizier General as head of government is the best way. Also as the "Emperor" is a constitutional head of state that does not take any part in the government, we see no needs to give him "help" and found this move to be unnecessary.

We are concerned that this could be a first step in a move to destroy the monarchy of Pontesi and warn Democratic Socialist Party of Beiteynu not to touch them.

Date18:00:06, April 04, 2009 CET
From Democratic Marxist Party (BIC)
ToDebating the King's Loyal President
MessageIf the Emperor does not take any part in government then what productive labor is he putting into the country? This right here proves his uselessness, Down with the Emperor!! Up with Marx!!!

Date01:20:02, April 05, 2009 CET
From Pontesian Royalist Party
ToDebating the King's Loyal President
MessageWe are not Beiteynu, not one member of our local party is from Beiteynu. Our new leader is 100% Pontesian and of the Anglican Church. Our old one was Barmenian. We agree with the DMP. Up with Marxist-Lennonism!

OOC: That was not a misspelling.

Date04:12:28, April 07, 2011 CET
From The English Monarchist Party
ToDebating the King's Loyal President
MessageWe need absolute Monarchy.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
  

Total Seats: 208

abstain
 

Total Seats: 192


Random fact: Players should not role-play characters without the consent of the owner, and if they find they have role-played the character beyond what the owner intended, they should withdraw or amend the role-play appropriately.

Random quote: "Conservatives define themselves in terms of what they oppose." - George Will

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70