We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Endangered Animals Protection Act of 2738
Details
Submitted by[?]: Genuine Progress Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2738
Description[?]:
| This is a re-filing of the endangered animal bill that is constantly being pushed by the GPA. ---------- This bill aims to officially ban the hunting of endangered animals in the whole Alorian nation. We believe that this issue is a national concern because these endangered animals are part of the ecological balance that sustains the life of this nation. If they become extinct, the whole ecological balance around Aloria would be disrupted. These animals do not just stay on one location; they migrate from one location to another. They can even migrate from one province to another or from one nation to another. That is why an endangered species not only affects the balance of one province but that of other provinces as well. The current Alorian law gives the power to decide about such matters to local governments. The problem with this is that one province can have laws that are so loose that hunting such animals can still be legal under certain conditions. We cannot afford that because the consequences of losing these animals forever does not affect only one province, but the whole nation, or even the whole world. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards hunting endangered animals.
Old value:: Local governments decide about this.
Current: Hunting endangered animals is illegal.
Proposed: Hunting endangered animals is illegal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:08:17, April 09, 2009 CET | From | New Aloria Party (NAP) | To | Debating the Endangered Animals Protection Act of 2738 |
| Message | Unless you can get the APP to vote for this I do not see this passing. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 186 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 472 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 53 |
| Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy. |
| Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |