Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 01:43:28
Server time: 22:16:31, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): dnobb | hexaus18 | Maarten_saridan | reformist2024 | Svet-Aldegar | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Civil Liberties

Details

Submitted by[?]: Pan-Quanzarian Conservative Union

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2739

Description[?]:

Making the wrong right.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:55:24, April 10, 2009 CET
FromCatholic Action
ToDebating the Civil Liberties
MessageThis Bill stands in total opposition to the description in its title.


Ted Steele
(Chairman of Catholic Action)

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 57

no
  

Total Seats: 8

abstain
  

Total Seats: 10


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "Political institutions are a superstructure resting on an economic foundation." - Vladimir Lenin

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 77