Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 01:58:27
Server time: 18:01:32, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Economic Nationalism Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Rutanian Heritage Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2740

Description[?]:

The 'Rutanian Heritage Party' proposes a reform of our economic relations with other nations, in order to encourage our domestic economy to prosper, including our job markets and manufacturing sector, and to retain our national sovereignty and autonomy on the world stage.
Rutania's national interests and benefit must take precedence over all other matters and international obligations.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:17:30, April 10, 2009 CET
From Rutanian Elitist Party
ToDebating the Economic Nationalism Act
MessageWe cannot support this proposals. The result of this would be the complete isolation and finally extinction of Rutania. If we do not play an important role on the international arena we will be considered as a lower-rank state and sentenced to death. I am sure the RHP would not want this.

Pierre LeBon,
Minister of Foreign Affairs

Date11:58:59, April 10, 2009 CET
From Rutanian Heritage Party
ToDebating the Economic Nationalism Act
MessageWe agree with the 'REP', in that we do not want Rutania to be considered a 'lower-rank state'. However, we do not believe that this legislation will have the affect that the 'REP' believe it will - in fact, on the contrary, keeping Rutania neutral and ensuring that we do not involve ourselves in entangling international alliances will prevent making enemies.

Date14:39:32, April 10, 2009 CET
From Rutanian Elitist Party
ToDebating the Economic Nationalism Act
MessageDoes the RHP know the example of Belgium, Denmark? Hitler attecked them though they were neutral states.

Date14:46:31, April 10, 2009 CET
From spencer green Party
ToDebating the Economic Nationalism Act
MessageYes but even though you make a good point Hitler was bent on conquest in Europe and beyond. Do WE AS A COUNTRY have any body like that near our borders?

Date15:00:22, April 10, 2009 CET
From Rutanian Heritage Party
ToDebating the Economic Nationalism Act
MessageAs the 'Spencer Party' have astutely observed, Hitler was a relatively unique case, with the aim to expand Germany's empire throughout Europe. Most wars are fought over disputes regarding land, or ideological and religious conflict. Generally speaking, neutrality prevents unnecessary involvement in such wars, and is undoubtedly in our best national interests. A nation that keeps to itself will pose a threat to no country.

Date22:44:38, April 10, 2009 CET
From spencer green Party
ToDebating the Economic Nationalism Act
Messagei agree. And may i ask do we have a leader bent on taking over our country? Also i support this bill and also believe just as the RHP does that A nation that keeps to itself will pose a threat to no country.

Date04:41:28, April 11, 2009 CET
From Rutanian Restoration Party
ToDebating the Economic Nationalism Act
MessageI doubt Nova Terra or the Saiserist League care if we are neutral or not......

We oppose.

Date07:34:28, April 11, 2009 CET
From Rutanian Heritage Party
ToDebating the Economic Nationalism Act
MessageNova Terra will not , as the Rutanian Heritage Party are allied with the organization and the party that controls it - the 'Confederacy of Social Darwinists'.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 82

no
   

Total Seats: 160

abstain
 

Total Seats: 53


Random fact: Cultural Protocols should generally be reflective of RP conducted within the nation and should not significantly alter or modify the ethnic, religious or linguistic composition without considerable and reasonable role-play or other justification.

Random quote: "Power always has to be kept in check; power exercised in secret, especially under the cloak of national security, is doubly dangerous." - William Proxmire

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 74