We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Research Animal Regulation Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Centrists
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2128
Description[?]:
Animal test subjects in the fields of medicine and cosmetics should be ensured at least some protection through mild regulations. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is unregulated.
Current: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Proposed: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in medical research.
Old value:: There are no restrictions on the use of animals for research.
Current: Animal research projects must apply for a license and submit to regulation.
Proposed: The use of animals in research is subject to basic regulations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:28:33, October 16, 2005 CET | From | Solentian Corporate Communist Party | To | Debating the Research Animal Regulation Bill |
Message | We disagree with Article 1... |
Date | 19:10:20, October 18, 2005 CET | From | United Centrists | To | Debating the Research Animal Regulation Bill |
Message | What would the SCCP prefer the policy on the use of animals in cosmetics research be? |
Date | 01:27:21, October 19, 2005 CET | From | Solentian Corporate Communist Party | To | Debating the Research Animal Regulation Bill |
Message | We prefer the use of animals in cosmetic research to be unregulated, however after further debate within the party, we withdraw our concern and can support the proposed measure as is. We apologize for any inconvenience. |
Date | 07:58:13, October 19, 2005 CET | From | National Socialists | To | Debating the Research Animal Regulation Bill |
Message | We disagree with the second proposal. Why not leave the research for medical purposes unhindered? Past opinions wished unhindered research on human cloning, why not sacrifice a little mouse? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 202 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 383 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 115 |
Random fact: Google Translate can help you with those language translations: https://translate.google.com/ |
Random quote: "A claim for equality of material position can be met only by a government with totalitarian powers." - Friedrich Hayek |