We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: "Pax in Focus, Pax in Terra" Weapon Development Act of 2742
Details
Submitted by[?]: Genuine Progress Alliance
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2742
Description[?]:
| In line with the national motto, "Pax in Focus, Pax in Terra" (Peace at Home, Peace for the World), we propose that we put an end to the production and storage of biological and chemical weapons in our nation. As we have mentioned, these weapons do nothing more than wreck havoc and create destruction in all of humanity and the natural environment. These weapons may give us a short-term victory during a war, but it gives a long-term loss of human life and a long-term deterioration of the health and well-being of every human in this world. Research shall be permitted, however, in order to widen our knowledge of these types of weapons so that we can be prepared for attacks of such kinds. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning biological and chemical weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Current: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Proposed: The nation shall never purchase, produce, or store biological or chemical weaponry, for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 201 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 549 |
| Random fact: Moderation reserves the discretion to declare RP laws invalid if the players supporting them are doing so in an excessively confrontational way. |
| Random quote: "Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end." - John Dalberg-Acton |