Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5472
Next month in: 03:03:43
Server time: 16:56:16, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): hyraemous | itsjustgav | Mbites2 | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Exclusionary Secession

Details

Submitted by[?]: Tuesday Is Coming

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2158

Description[?]:

Any citizen or group of citizens may choose to designate any land they own as an exclusionary free settlement. Such an area shall become, for all legal and actual purposes, outside of Lodamun's authority. The inhabitants will not be permitted to pay taxes, recieve government benefits, or work outside of the settlement without a visa and tax penalties. They may choose to freely move out of such a settlement, and return to Lodamun. No products may be sold into or out of the settlements without specific permission and conditions decided by the minister of internal affairs.
The laws of the Five Natoins of Lodamun shall not be enforceable within the settlements, however the owners and inhabitants can be held liable for harboring Lodamese criminals. The inhabitants shall forfeit their rights to vote as well.

No person may join such a community without the voluntary agreement of all parties involved.

All native tribes, or other such person already qualifying for this, shall be permitted to choose to form such an exclusionary free settlement. No legal penalties may be assessed on those who prematurely take advantage of this law, should it pass.

The free settlements may not be used as bases to harm Lodamun citizens.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:25:35, October 18, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Exclusionary Secession
MessageAdd: "The free settlements may not be used as bases to harm Lodamun citizens." They may not, for instance, legalize slavery and then raid Lodamun for slaves. Nor may they set up a giant factory smokestack to disperse their pollution into Lodamun.

Add also: "The government of the Five Nations retains responsibility for foreign policy and defence."

Date18:56:41, October 18, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Exclusionary Secession
MessageWould it be permitted for them to set up factories, etc. however being liable for any pollution and subject to punitive damages in suits?

Date18:58:58, October 18, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Exclusionary Secession
Message"The government of the Five Nations retains responsibility for foreign policy and defence."

Can you clarity this? I thought it was implied.

Date21:28:42, October 18, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Exclusionary Secession
MessageIt states settlements will be outside Lodamun's authority. It needs to be clarified that Lodamun's right to conduct foreign policy and defence are maintained. Lodamun must also be able to prevent harm coming to Lodamun citizens through irresponsible polluting by free settlements. Punitive damages after the fact are (1) no help to restoreing already damaged ecosystems and (2) undercut the bill's intent by making Lodamun law apply within the free communities.

Date22:48:55, October 18, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Exclusionary Secession
MessageThe ability to be held accountable for one's actions is the best way to prevent destructive behavior. Punitive and actual damages address this. They should be permitted to pollute in such a way that it does not harm others.

Lodamun law won't apply, but these people will not gain any special priveledges to harm others who opt to remain in Lodamun.

Date19:29:29, October 19, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Exclusionary Secession
MessageIf Lodamun cannot intervene to stop harm to Lodamun citizens *while it is happening,* but only can after the fact, then we will have to vote against a proposal which we otherwise support whole-heartedly as a localaization of power and part of our long-term goal of dismantling central government authority.

Date23:11:03, October 19, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Exclusionary Secession
MessageWe are willing to work out whatever your objection is, once we figure it out.

Date04:28:12, October 20, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Exclusionary Secession
MessageZing! Lodamun's environmental standards must be protected from pollution by the free communities, that's all. They can't set up a giant smokestack to send us their pollution. It's merely an interpretation of our suggested wording.

Date05:18:10, October 20, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Exclusionary Secession
MessageWe will modify the wording soon, this is acceptable.(when i have time to)

Date22:22:35, November 04, 2005 CET
FromInternational Society of Bankers
ToDebating the Exclusionary Secession
MessageWe support this act.

Date18:31:28, December 16, 2005 CET
FromSlaytanic Wehrmacht
ToDebating the Exclusionary Secession
Messagewe also support this act, if it is put to voting.

Date18:26:46, December 18, 2005 CET
FromSlaytanic Wehrmacht
ToDebating the Exclusionary Secession
Messageguess you have to restart the voting procedure, it got rolled back.

Date21:28:09, December 18, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Exclusionary Secession
MessageSorry about that...

Date21:41:18, December 18, 2005 CET
FromSlaytanic Wehrmacht
ToDebating the Exclusionary Secession
Messageits not your fault :)

Date23:31:01, December 18, 2005 CET
FromSlaytanic Wehrmacht
ToDebating the Exclusionary Secession
Messagewell, at least i hope the rollback is not your fault ;)

Date23:41:34, December 18, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Exclusionary Secession
MessageWell...we may be tempted to take the credit for it.

Date01:42:52, December 19, 2005 CET
FromLodamun Centre-Left Coalition
ToDebating the Exclusionary Secession
MessageBearing in mind this takes a supermajority to pass, even without our vote it would make it (68). But yes, anyhow.

Date03:59:26, December 19, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the Exclusionary Secession
MessageIsn't this a little too not fascist for the Remnants?

Date04:18:04, December 19, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Exclusionary Secession
MessageIt was written and put to a vote under the TiC Remnants

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 81

no
  

Total Seats: 19

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: All role-play must respect the established cultural background in Culturally Protected nations.

    Random quote: "It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." - Thomas Jefferson

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 80