We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Religious Taxation and Education
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Nationalist Alliance (ZC)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2745
Description[?]:
| Why should religions not contribute to society through taxation just as every other citizen and business must do? We should not allow religious zealots to brainwash our youth. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
Taxation of religious institutions.
Old value:: No religions are taxed.
Current: Recognized religions are not taxed.
Proposed: All religious income, despite the use, is taxed.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The governments stance on religious schools.
Old value:: Any religion may set up a school, with no regulations.
Current: Only recognised religions may set up religious schools, with no regulations.
Proposed: Religious schools are not allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:58:09, April 22, 2009 CET | From |  Zardugal Liberal Party | To | Debating the Religious Taxation and Education |
| Message | "The UZLP as chosen to support this bill though we would perfer that instead of outlawing religious school altogether, they should be allowed with regulations, as to give full rights to religion without infringing on the rights of a person decision for free thought." Darcy Moffat Chairman of the UZLP |
| Date | 19:49:11, April 22, 2009 CET | From | ruthopie Party | To | Debating the Religious Taxation and Education |
| Message | they should be allowed religious school they teach people strong morals |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 600 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Catch a man a fish, and you can sell it to him. Teach a man to fish, and you ruin a wonderful business opportunity." - Karl Marx |