We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Transportation Changes
Details
Submitted by[?]: Proletariat Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2745
Description[?]:
| Just to further transportation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the post office
Old value:: Only private post agencies exist, and the services they provide are unregulated.
Current: Only private post agencies exist, and the services they provide are unregulated.
Proposed: There is a nationalised post office agency. Private post offices are allowed to exist but the services provided by them are regulated.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning private cars.
Old value:: Private cars are allowed, but people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives are provided for cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Current: Only cars using environmentally friendly fuels are allowed.
Proposed: Only cars using environmentally friendly fuels are allowed.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Train Operating Companies (TOC).
Old value:: Private companies operate TOCs throughout the country.
Current: The State owns and operates a national TOC, alongside private TOCs.
Proposed: There is a single publicly owned TOC.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:39:41, April 21, 2009 CET | From | BDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen | To | Debating the Transportation Changes |
| Message | We oppose article 3. |
| Date | 20:21:51, April 21, 2009 CET | From | Socialist Party | To | Debating the Transportation Changes |
| Message | Why? A single train operating company is the only thing that makes sense on a single rail network. Besides it serves all interests best if this company is in public hands, under workers and commuters control and management as to ansure good quality and cheap train transport. It also serves our overall economy well if the industry were to pay lesser tarifs to transport their cargo across the country and to and from our harbors. |
| Date | 20:50:34, April 21, 2009 CET | From | Proletariat Party | To | Debating the Transportation Changes |
| Message | In that case DSPB, after this passes if you still have that feeling maybe we can do a reversal on that issue. |
| Date | 21:08:51, April 21, 2009 CET | From | BDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen | To | Debating the Transportation Changes |
| Message | Okay. |
| Date | 15:53:31, April 22, 2009 CET | From | Am Echad, Pays Libre | To | Debating the Transportation Changes |
| Message | We agree with one but not the rest, if you could put on on a single bill we would vote yes. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 114 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 86 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Culturally Open nations can adopt advisory/non-enforceable Nation Descriptions. See http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6242 |
| Random quote: "Those looking for ideology in the White House should consider this: for the men who rule our world, rules are for other people." - Naomi Klein |