We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Employer`s rights
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Conservatists
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2746
Description[?]:
This bill will help the Likatonian economy |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Employer's rights in regards to firing striking workers.
Old value:: Employers can fire workers who are deemed to have gone on strike without reasonable reasons.
Current: Employers are free to fire workers who go on strike.
Proposed: Government approval is needed before strikers can be fired.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on industry and subsidies to industrial operations.
Old value:: The government acts as an investor of last resort, by nationalizing failing industries that provide vital goods or services.
Current: The government acts as an investor of last resort, by nationalizing failing industries that provide vital goods or services.
Proposed: The government subsidizes private enterprises that face bankruptcy.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:02:24, April 23, 2009 CET | From | The Likatonian Imperium party | To | Debating the Employer`s rights |
Message | i can agree with Article 1 but i don't know what to think about article 2 at this point in time. |
Date | 01:46:21, April 24, 2009 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Employer`s rights |
Message | We like the first article, and admire the sentiment of the second - but we are worried that subsidizing failing industry without any kind of accompanying control, is basically handing free money to bad business. |
Date | 11:24:13, April 24, 2009 CET | From | Neo Kanist Rite Party of Sorbanika | To | Debating the Employer`s rights |
Message | Firstly we would like to congratulate the LNF for proposing their first bill in 41 years. Secondly we agree with the SuDP. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 325 | |||
no | Total Seats: 139 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 286 |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: "Whenever the people are well informed, they can be trusted with their own government; that whenever things get so far wrong as to attract their notice, they may be relied on to set them to rights." - Thomas Jefferson |