Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 00:42:31
Server time: 23:17:28, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): reformist2024 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Better Arm Our Forces Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Patriot Conservative

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2127

Description[?]:

The police force is among the most honorable in the nation and they are having difficulty fighting criminals without top-notch equipment. It is thus proposed that police officers be allowed to carry military-grade equipment.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:16:01, October 17, 2005 CET
From United Centrists
ToDebating the Better Arm Our Forces Act
MessageThe SCCP has already proposed this bill, which is still in debate.

Date23:24:06, October 17, 2005 CET
From Patriot Conservative
ToDebating the Better Arm Our Forces Act
MessageThey haven't gotten moving.

Date23:26:56, October 17, 2005 CET
From Patriot Conservative
ToDebating the Better Arm Our Forces Act
MessageNote: It's been sitting in the debate section for four years.

Date23:27:13, October 17, 2005 CET
From Patriot Conservative
ToDebating the Better Arm Our Forces Act
MessageNote: It's been sitting in the debate section for four years.

Date23:27:59, October 17, 2005 CET
From Patriot Conservative
ToDebating the Better Arm Our Forces Act
MessageNote: It's been sitting in the debate section for four years.

Date23:34:18, October 17, 2005 CET
From United Centrists
ToDebating the Better Arm Our Forces Act
MessageEven so, you should instead contribute to the existing debate and bring it to the attention of the other parties. Though we have personally been waiting for other parties to share their views on the subject, we have now decided to agree with it.

Date01:47:58, October 18, 2005 CET
From Solentian Corporate Communist Party
ToDebating the Better Arm Our Forces Act
MessageWe thank the UC for the support and CONDEMN the PC for their harboring of opinions and copying the actions of others for pure political gain.

If they agreed with this proposal, they should have voiced it in debate instead of proposing a copy of the bill.

Once again, the Republic suffers for the lack of a competent leader.

Date02:17:49, October 18, 2005 CET
From Patriot Conservative
ToDebating the Better Arm Our Forces Act
MessageI didn't even see your bill. If you cared about this you would have remembered not to leave it hanging for FOUR years. We condemn the SCCP and their laziness.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 582

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
        

    Total Seats: 118


    Random fact: Selucia is Particracy's modern take on Ancient Rome, located on the continent of Majatra.

    Random quote: "I'm not an environmentalist. I'm an earth warrior." - Darryl Cherney

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 59