We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Better Arm Our Forces Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Patriot Conservative
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2127
Description[?]:
The police force is among the most honorable in the nation and they are having difficulty fighting criminals without top-notch equipment. It is thus proposed that police officers be allowed to carry military-grade equipment. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The weapons used by police forces.
Old value:: Police officers may only carry standard firearms apart from specially trained firearms units.
Current: Police officers may only carry standard firearms apart from specially trained firearms units.
Proposed: Police officers carry military-grade equipment.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:16:01, October 17, 2005 CET | From | United Centrists | To | Debating the Better Arm Our Forces Act |
Message | The SCCP has already proposed this bill, which is still in debate. |
Date | 23:24:06, October 17, 2005 CET | From | Patriot Conservative | To | Debating the Better Arm Our Forces Act |
Message | They haven't gotten moving. |
Date | 23:26:56, October 17, 2005 CET | From | Patriot Conservative | To | Debating the Better Arm Our Forces Act |
Message | Note: It's been sitting in the debate section for four years. |
Date | 23:27:13, October 17, 2005 CET | From | Patriot Conservative | To | Debating the Better Arm Our Forces Act |
Message | Note: It's been sitting in the debate section for four years. |
Date | 23:27:59, October 17, 2005 CET | From | Patriot Conservative | To | Debating the Better Arm Our Forces Act |
Message | Note: It's been sitting in the debate section for four years. |
Date | 23:34:18, October 17, 2005 CET | From | United Centrists | To | Debating the Better Arm Our Forces Act |
Message | Even so, you should instead contribute to the existing debate and bring it to the attention of the other parties. Though we have personally been waiting for other parties to share their views on the subject, we have now decided to agree with it. |
Date | 01:47:58, October 18, 2005 CET | From | Solentian Corporate Communist Party | To | Debating the Better Arm Our Forces Act |
Message | We thank the UC for the support and CONDEMN the PC for their harboring of opinions and copying the actions of others for pure political gain. If they agreed with this proposal, they should have voiced it in debate instead of proposing a copy of the bill. Once again, the Republic suffers for the lack of a competent leader. |
Date | 02:17:49, October 18, 2005 CET | From | Patriot Conservative | To | Debating the Better Arm Our Forces Act |
Message | I didn't even see your bill. If you cared about this you would have remembered not to leave it hanging for FOUR years. We condemn the SCCP and their laziness. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 582 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 118 |
Random fact: Selucia is Particracy's modern take on Ancient Rome, located on the continent of Majatra. |
Random quote: "I'm not an environmentalist. I'm an earth warrior." - Darryl Cherney |