Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5471
Next month in: 03:42:49
Server time: 08:17:10, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Immigration

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Kanjoran Centrist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2748

Description[?]:

The KCP believes that the Kanjoran economy can benefit from the continued and prolonged presence of immigrant groups, we believe that skilled people of all nationalities who wish to be part of Kanjoran society should be allowed to be so.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:40:55, April 27, 2009 CET
FromUnion Hosienne-Démocrate (UHD)
ToDebating the Immigration
MessageAbsolutely not. Kanjor has 279,415,761 people; active unemployment (which does not take into account those who have given up looking for a job) in Yewao is nearly 10%. We do not foresee any problem with the current legislation. This is too liberal of an agenda.

Kanjor for the Kanjoriens!

Date23:39:02, April 27, 2009 CET
FromThe Kanjoran Centrist Party
ToDebating the Immigration
MessageRacism and discrimination against foreign nationals as well?

You stated the convention for coaltion government, we are now calling upon a coalition vote - we are entitled to two more as this area falls within our mandate of Internal Affairs.

Premier Stonemason

Date00:43:32, April 28, 2009 CET
FromThe Kanjoran Centrist Party
ToDebating the Immigration
MessageDoes the coalition have a stance on this?

Date00:51:31, April 28, 2009 CET
FromParti Populiste Nationale de Kanjor
ToDebating the Immigration
MessageThe MRN is staunchly opposed to this for the same reasons that the PRK is. The nation has a surplus of workers, and foreign immigrants have no right to take the jobs that rightfully belong to the citizens of our nation. This is not racism; it is merely acting in the best interest of those that should be the most important to Kanjor -- it's natural born citizenry.

Date00:59:43, April 28, 2009 CET
FromThe Royal Union
ToDebating the Immigration
MessageYes but we know historically protectionism will not bolster our economy.

Date02:28:57, April 28, 2009 CET
FromParti Populiste Nationale de Kanjor
ToDebating the Immigration
MessageProtectionism isn't what's at issue here; this is not a question of tariffs, but a question of the common labourer and his importance to the state. Are we to let non-Kanjoriens work for Kanjorien industries, even though there are more than enough Kanjoriens to perform the work? It is nonsensical. We are not responsible for foreigners, and neither should our companies be. It should be of prime importance that Kanjorien products are produced by Kanjorien hands.

Date02:30:21, April 28, 2009 CET
FromUnion Hosienne-Démocrate (UHD)
ToDebating the Immigration
MessageYou cannot hold a "coalition vote" given that you do not hold the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the MRN does. This proposal falls under Foreign Affairs (specifically "Foreign Policy") and not Internal Affairs.

There is nothing racist about it. We do not care if the foreigners are Dundorfians or Lodami; they are NOT welcome here.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 172

no
   

Total Seats: 428

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility.

Random quote: "What luck for the rulers that men do not think." - Adolf Hitler

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63